Skip to main content

Is lalimao.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 拉力猫指纹浏览器团队 Reviews

lalimao.com favicon

Is lalimao.com Safe? Security Analysis for 拉力猫指纹浏览器团队

Check if lalimao.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceN/asmall
jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeOwl CarouselSwiper+3 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 9:11:16 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

拉力猫指纹浏览器是一款专注于跨境电商和社交媒体营销领域的指纹浏览器软件,提供多账号批量管理和防关联浏览器环境,支持Windows和macOS平台。该产品通过模拟不同设备的软硬件指纹信息,帮助用户实现多开浏览器和独立IP管理,适用于亚马逊、eBay、TikTok等电商及社媒平台。网站内容丰富,设计专业,具备良好的用户体验和移动优化。技术栈包括jQuery、Bootstrap及多种前端库,显示出一定的数字化成熟度。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS,但缺乏安全头和安全政策披露,存在改进空间。WHOIS信息缺失,域名注册状态不明,影响整体信任度。建议加强隐私合规和安全政策建设,完善安全配置以提升整体安全姿态和用户信任。

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeOwl CarouselSwiperFancyboxAnimate.cssMagnific Popup

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该公司定位于跨境电商和社媒营销软件市场,提供针对账号防关联和多账号管理的专业浏览器解决方案。其商业模式主要基于软件销售和订阅服务,目标客户为跨境卖家和营销人员。网站展示了丰富的行业适用平台和合作生态,体现出较强的市场针对性和竞争优势。尽管缺乏公开的公司注册信息和物理地址,但通过用户评价和产品功能展示,显示出一定的市场认可度。未来可通过增强合规性和安全透明度,进一步巩固市场地位。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@lalimao.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

当前安全成熟度中等,网站启用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,但未检测到安全相关HTTP头,缺少隐私政策和漏洞披露机制,可能导致合规风险和用户信任下降。无明显漏洞或敏感信息泄露,但WHOIS信息缺失增加潜在风险。建议实施安全头策略,公开隐私和安全政策,建立漏洞响应流程,提升整体安全文化和合规水平。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

完善并公开隐私政策和Cookie政策,确保GDPR等法规合规。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

拉力猫指纹浏览器团队

Description:

拉力猫指纹浏览器是一款通过模拟不同设备的软硬件指纹信息,实现一台电脑同时多开浏览器,每个防关联浏览器独立IP,适用于跨境电商亚马逊、eBay、TikTok,社媒营销Facebook、Twitter等行业

Key Services:
指纹浏览器软件多账号批量管理防关联浏览器环境独立IP支持
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeOwl CarouselSwiperFancyboxAnimate.cssMagnific Popup
Platforms:
WindowsmacOS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS implied by canonical URL (https://www.lalimao.com/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese targeting e-commerce and social media marketing users.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

9 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(320 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:47.120.1.181
Name Servers:
dns13.hichina.com
dns14.hichina.com
MX Records:
10: mx.ym.163.com
SOA:Serial: 2025042413, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:342ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用多种成熟前端技术和库,支持响应式设计和多平台兼容,技术实现较为现代。缺乏CMS迹象,可能为定制开发。性能表现中等,未见明显加载瓶颈。无明显技术债务,但安全配置不足。建议加强无障碍支持和SEO优化,完善安全配置,提升整体技术质量和用户体验。
Analyze Another Website