Is landrover.com Safe? Security Analysis for Jaguar Land Rover Limited
https://landrover.comCheck if landrover.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Jaguar Land Rover Limited operates the Land Rover brand website, providing a global market selector to guide users to region-specific content. The company is a well-established premium automotive manufacturer with a strong global presence. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure leveraging Adobe Experience Manager CMS, Adobe Target for marketing personalization, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The technical implementation is modern and performant, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and consent-based cookie management, though explicit security headers and incident response information are absent. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for large brands. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with Jaguar Land Rover's brand identity.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The website targets a global audience interested in Land Rover vehicles, offering localized content by region and country. The business model focuses on vehicle sales and brand engagement through digital channels. The use of advanced marketing tools like Adobe Target indicates a focus on personalized customer experiences. The absence of direct contact details on this page suggests contact is managed elsewhere or via dealer networks. The company operates at an enterprise scale within the transportation sector, with a strong brand reputation and consistent global branding. Partnerships with Jaguar Land Rover corporate sites are evident, reinforcing brand cohesion.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and integrates consent management for cookies, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. Use of Adobe Target and Helix RUM scripts is consent-aware. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, which could improve transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and published policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy accessible from all pages.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
Choose your market and language to explore Land Rover’s official website in your region.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Consent management for cookies
- Use of Adobe Target with consent checks
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website provides a comprehensive market selector for global regions and countries.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration
LOWCurrent value: "max-age=15768000 ; includeSubDomains"
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about landrover.com
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published