Skip to main content

Is langdoc.org a Scam? Security Check Results - langdoc.org Reviews

langdoc.org favicon

Is langdoc.org Safe? Security Analysis for Language Documentation and Archiving Conference – Just another WordPress site

Check if langdoc.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherGermanysmall
WordPressElementorAstra ThemejQuery
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 4:49:17 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Language Documentation and Archiving Conference website serves as an informational platform for an academic and cultural preservation event organized jointly by ELAR and PARADISEC. It targets researchers, linguists, and indigenous language communities, providing conference announcements, training sessions, and archival resources. The site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Astra theme, hosted by Cronon GmbH in Germany, reflecting a moderate level of technical maturity with good mobile optimization and basic SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, indicating room for improvement. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally presented, though it could enhance security and privacy features to better protect users and comply with regulations.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorAstra ThemejQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website positions itself as a niche academic conference organizer focusing on indigenous language documentation and archiving. Its business model is non-profit, relying on partnerships with recognized organizations ELAR and PARADISEC. The target audience includes academic researchers and indigenous communities, with key services centered on conference events and training. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the conference timeline, supporting legitimacy. Social media presence on major platforms enhances outreach and community engagement. The site lacks direct contact emails or phone numbers but provides a contact form, which may limit direct communication. Advertising and analytics usage are minimal, reflecting a focus on content over commercial activities.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible malware or phishing indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. The site should implement recommended security headers, enable DNSSEC, and provide clear security policies to improve resilience and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website is dedicated to the Language Documentation and Archiving Conference, organized jointly by ELAR and PARADISEC, focusing on conference and training sessions during the Decade of Indigenous Languages. It announces the next conference in Fall 2026 and provides access to past conferences.

Key Services:
Conference organizationTraining sessionsArchiving and documentation resources
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorAstra ThemejQuery
Frameworks:
WordPress CMS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress site using Elementor and Astra theme.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:langdoc.org
Issuer:Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36
Valid Until:6/17/2026 (283 days)
SANs:langdoc.org, www.langdoc.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(167 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:217.160.0.223
AAAA Records:2001:8d8:100f:f000::200
Name Servers:
docks03.rzone.de
shades18.rzone.de
MX Records:
5: smtpin.rzone.de
SOA:Serial: 2022022239, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:207ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Astra theme, indicating a contemporary and flexible infrastructure. Hosting is provided by Cronon GmbH in Germany, consistent with the registrant country. The site loads with moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. However, no advanced analytics or tracking services are detected, suggesting minimal data collection. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. The site could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced SEO metadata to improve visibility and user engagement.
Analyze Another Website