Skip to main content

Is laserart.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - laserart.lv Reviews

laserart.lv favicon

Is laserart.lv Safe? Security Analysis for LaserArt - Metāla sienas mākslas paneļi/Dekori, Mājdzīvnieku barotavas

Check if laserart.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
jQuery 3.1.0jQuery ValidateSelect2 4.0.6jQuery UI 1.12Slick Carousel 1.6.0+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:50:29 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

LaserArt is a Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in metal wall art panels and pet feeders. The website targets pet owners and home decor enthusiasts, offering a niche product range with options for custom individual designs. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses modern JavaScript libraries and CDN-hosted assets to deliver a good user experience. However, the absence of visible privacy and terms of service policies and lack of WHOIS data limit full trust verification. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some privacy awareness.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.1.0jQuery ValidateSelect2 4.0.6jQuery UI 1.12Slick Carousel 1.6.0FancyboxStar Rating SVG

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

LaserArt operates in the retail sector focusing on decorative metal panels and pet feeders, serving primarily the Latvian market with multilingual support. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with features like wishlist, cart, and promotional code handling. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a consistent brand presence online. The use of CDN and analytics tools suggests a moderate level of digital maturity. Lack of explicit business contact details and certifications limits transparency.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@laserart.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses input validation on forms, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The site uses AJAX extensively for cart and wishlist management, which appears secure but should be regularly audited. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent but no visible privacy policy. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

LaserArt offers metal wall art panels/decor and pet feeders, targeting pet owners and home decor enthusiasts.

Key Services:
Metal wall art panelsPet feedersCustom individual design orders
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.1.0jQuery ValidateSelect2 4.0.6jQuery UI 1.12Slick Carousel 1.6.0FancyboxStar Rating SVG
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of AJAX for cart and wishlist
  • Input validation via jQuery Validate

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Latvian e-commerce site selling metal wall art and pet feeders.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.237.98.22 ip4:91.237.98.18 +a +mx +include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.237.98.18
Name Servers:
ns1.noc.lvDNS only
ns2.noc.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073007, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:109ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.237.98.22 ip4:91.237.98.18 +a +mx +include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a combination of jQuery, jQuery UI, Select2, Slick Carousel, and Fancybox for UI components, indicating a mature but somewhat dated tech stack. Assets are served via a CDN, improving load times. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility basics. SEO is supported with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or backend platform was identified from the HTML. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by modernizing the tech stack and optimizing scripts. No critical technical debt or risks were detected from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website