Skip to main content

Is lashprovocator.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA LASHPROVOCATOR Reviews

lashprovocator.lv favicon

Is lashprovocator.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA LASHPROVOCATOR

Check if lashprovocator.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
jQueryPhotoSwipeFontello iconsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:05:38 AM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Lashprovocator is a Latvian small retail company specializing in premium eyelash extension materials, including eyelashes, preparāti (solutions), tools, and starter kits. The website targets professionals and consumers interested in eyelash extensions, positioning itself as a niche player in the Latvian beauty retail market. The business model is e-commerce focused, offering a broad product range with clear contact information and basic privacy and cookie policies, indicating a professional approach to customer engagement and compliance. Technically, the website employs common web technologies such as jQuery, PhotoSwipe, and Fontello icons, alongside marketing and analytics tools like Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics. The site is served over HTTPS with asynchronous loading of scripts, contributing to moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers implementation to enhance overall security posture. From a security perspective, the website demonstrates a good baseline with HTTPS and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers and explicit security or incident response policies suggests moderate maturity in security practices. The use of third-party tracking pixels indicates moderate user tracking, balanced by the presence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website is professionally designed and functional, with moderate security and privacy compliance. The lack of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy assessment, but available information supports a legitimate small business operation. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response readiness, and mobile accessibility would strengthen the site's security posture and user trust.

Detected Technologies

jQueryPhotoSwipeFontello iconsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Lashprovocator operates in the retail sector focused on beauty and cosmetic products, specifically eyelash extension materials. The company leverages an e-commerce platform to reach a niche market in Latvia, targeting both professionals and consumers. The business benefits from clear contact channels and basic compliance documentation, which supports customer trust. The use of Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics indicates an active marketing and analytics strategy to optimize customer engagement. The partnership with SIA MegaSoft for website development suggests collaboration with local IT service providers. The company appears to have a stable market position within its niche but lacks visible certifications or broader business ecosystem affiliations. Growth opportunities may include expanding product lines, enhancing digital marketing, and improving technical infrastructure.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@lashprovocator.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712777****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website maintains a foundational security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible leakage of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks, though mitigated by cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small retail business but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA LASHPROVOCATOR

Description:

Skropstu pieaudzēšanas materiāli no profesionāļiem - plašs klāsts melnu, brūnu un krāsainu skropstu, līmju un citu rīku izvēlei.

Key Services:
Sale of eyelashesSale of preparāti (solutions)Sale of materials and instrumentsSale of starter kits
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryPhotoSwipeFontello iconsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:81.94.233.3 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

9 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:81.94.233.3
Name Servers:
ns1.server2.megasoft.lvDNS only
ns2.server2.megasoft.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.lashprovocator.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025070505, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:175ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:81.94.233.3 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery and PhotoSwipe for UI interactions and image galleries, supported by Fontello for iconography. Marketing and analytics are handled via Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager, loaded asynchronously to optimize performance. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly identified, and hosting provider details are not available. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. The site could benefit from modernization efforts such as adopting newer JavaScript frameworks, improving accessibility compliance, and implementing advanced security headers to reduce technical debt and enhance resilience.
Analyze Another Website