Skip to main content

Is last.fm a Scam? Security Check Results - Last.fm Ltd. Reviews

last.fm favicon

Is last.fm Safe? Security Analysis for Last.fm Ltd.

Check if last.fm is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Kingdomlarge
JavaScriptRequireJSNew Relic monitoringHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:01:45 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Last.fm Ltd. operates one of the world's largest online music services, offering music streaming, artist discovery, and personalized recommendations. The platform leverages user listening data (scrobbles) to power its music insights and community features. Owned by Paramount Global, Last.fm holds a strong market position as a leading music media platform with a large global user base. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and supports multiple languages, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks, performance monitoring via New Relic, and adheres to best practices in SEO and accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policy and incident response pages are not publicly found. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, suitable for a large media company.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptRequireJSNew Relic monitoringHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Last.fm's business model centers on music streaming and discovery, monetized through premium subscriptions (Last.fm Pro) and advertising. The platform targets music enthusiasts globally, providing personalized music experiences and social features. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive music data and integration with other music services like Spotify and YouTube. The company benefits from being part of Paramount Global, leveraging its media ecosystem. The website's multi-language support and rich interactive content indicate a focus on user engagement and retention. Partnerships with advertising and privacy compliance vendors demonstrate a mature marketing and compliance strategy.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. Use of Content Security Policy and other headers mitigates common web vulnerabilities. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, which could hinder timely reporting of security issues. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and advertising, which should be regularly audited to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with explicit security documentation and disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Last.fm Ltd.

Description:

The world's largest online music service. Listen online, find out more about your favourite artists, and get music recommendations, only at Last.fm

Key Services:
Music streamingMusic recommendationsArtist discoveryUser listening tracking (scrobbling)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptRequireJSNew Relic monitoringHTML5CSS3
Frameworks:
RequireJS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF protections implied

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
New Relic
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
BidBarrelGoogle Ad Manager
Tracking Pixels:
OneTrustCookielawAdsafeProtected
Marketing Tools:
New Relic
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive widgets

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=300"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:64.30.226.54/31 ip4:74.125.148.0/22 ip4:216.239.125.28/28 ip4:202.73.54.176/28 ip4:58.65.7.128/28 ip4:62.108.138.0/28 ip4:216.239.114.214/31 ip4:216.239.114.222/31 ip4:216.239.122.115 ip4:216.239.122.135 include:servers.mcsv.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:lastfm-dmarc-reports-GRP@paramount.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.last.fm
Issuer:Sectigo RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA
Valid Until:3/25/2026 (201 days)
SANs:*.last.fm, last.fm

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(194 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.96.123.111
Name Servers:
dns1.p09.nsone.net
dns2.p09.nsone.net
dns3.p09.nsone.net
dns4.p09.nsone.net
ns0004.secondary.cloudflare.com
ns0243.secondary.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: mxa-00262c01.gslb.pphosted.com
0: mxb-00262c01.gslb.pphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 1654459712, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:64.30.226.54/31 ip4:74.125.148.0/22 ip4:216.239.125.28/28 ip4:202.73.54.176/28 ip4:58.65.7.128/28 ip4:62.108.138.0/28 ip4:216.239.114.214/31 ip4:216.239.114.222/31 ip4:216.239.122.115 ip4:216.239.122.135 include:servers.mcsv.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a custom CMS with RequireJS for module loading and extensive use of JavaScript for dynamic content. Performance monitoring is implemented via New Relic, indicating proactive performance management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting appears to be managed by CBS Interactive / Paramount infrastructure, ensuring enterprise-grade reliability. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks and enhancing security documentation.
Analyze Another Website