Skip to main content

Is latgalespiens.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Latgales Piens Reviews

latgalespiens.lv favicon

Is latgalespiens.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Latgales Piens

Check if latgalespiens.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviamedium
jQueryWooCommerceElementorGoogle FontsGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:04:15 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Latgales Piens is a regional dairy product manufacturer based in Latvia, operating as part of the AS Preiļu siers group. The company specializes in producing a full range of whole milk products including milk, kefir, cream, butter, cheeses, and desserts, targeting consumers primarily in the Latgale region. The website reflects a medium-sized business with a clear market position as the sole full assortment whole milk producer in Latgale. The digital presence is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a modern but standard e-commerce infrastructure. The site is well-structured, mobile optimized, and includes social media integration, enhancing customer engagement and brand visibility. However, the absence of privacy and terms of service pages indicates gaps in compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

jQueryWooCommerceElementorGoogle FontsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company benefits from its affiliation with the AS Preiļu siers concern, which provides a strong regional network including subsidiaries and partners such as AS Krāslavas piens and SIA Vietējā. This ecosystem supports diversified dairy product offerings and regional distribution. The business model focuses on manufacturing and retail, with a clear emphasis on quality and regional identity. The website content and linked domains suggest a stable partnership ecosystem and a focus on local market penetration. Growth indicators include active marketing via social media and regular news updates. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales through retail and possibly wholesale channels.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

l*****@latgalespiens.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716543****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

AS Latgales Piens

Registration Number:

41503028291

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, demonstrating basic security and privacy awareness. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages represents a compliance risk, especially under GDPR. No forms or input fields were found, reducing immediate risk of input-based vulnerabilities. The use of common CMS and plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a comprehensive privacy policy page to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Latgales Piens

Description:

AS “Latgales piens” is part of AS “Preiļu siers” concern and is the only full assortment whole milk product manufacturer in the Latgale region.

Key Services:
Production of milkProduction of kefirProduction of creamProduction of butterProduction of various dairy desserts and cheeses
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryWooCommerceElementorGoogle FontsGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
WordPressWooCommerce
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "1"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:80.232.255.184 ip4:89.111.13.208 ip4:217.199.120.71 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1432-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.111.13.208
Name Servers:
ns1.tevale.netDNS only
ns2.tevale.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.tevale.com
SOA:Serial: 2025021802, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:120ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:80.232.255.184 ip4:89.111.13.208 ip4:217.199.120.71 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder and WooCommerce for product management, indicating a standard e-commerce setup. The inclusion of Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager shows integration of external resources for design and analytics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site structure is clear with well-defined navigation menus and product categorization. However, no advanced hosting or CDN information was detected. The technical stack is modern but relies on common open-source components that require vigilant maintenance to avoid security risks.
Analyze Another Website