Skip to main content

Is latma.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - latma.lv Reviews

L

Is latma.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

Check if latma.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:20:39 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website latma.lv is currently inaccessible beyond a security verification page that employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 to prevent automated access. No business content, metadata, or contact information is available for analysis, and WHOIS data retrieval failed due to query limits. The site appears to be protected by a generic web application firewall or security mechanism, which restricts content visibility and limits the ability to assess the site's business and security posture comprehensively. The technical infrastructure includes Bootstrap 5.3.3 and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating some level of modern frontend technology and bot mitigation. However, the absence of visible security headers, privacy policies, or contact details reduces trust and compliance confidence. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, business credibility, and privacy compliance due to the blocking mechanism and lack of accessible information.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and metadata, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There is no indication of company name, sector, services, or market positioning. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, preventing verification of registration details or legitimacy. The site likely serves a business or service that requires protection from automated access, but without further data, no conclusions about business model or partnerships can be drawn.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal but includes Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated bot access. No other security headers or mechanisms are visible in the provided content. The lack of HTTPS information and security policies reduces confidence in the overall security maturity. The presence of a WAF or security challenge page suggests some level of protection, but the inability to access content limits the assessment of vulnerabilities or compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration to ensure secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website content is a security verification page with Google reCAPTCHA v3 and no actual business content accessible, indicating a WAF or security challenge blocking direct access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot verification

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security verification page using Google reCAPTCHA v3.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1288-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.latma.lv
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:9/17/2025 (48 days)
SANs:*.latma.lv, latma.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.151.30.170
AAAA Records:2a07:7800::170
Name Servers:
ns1.zehost.netDNS only
ns2.zehost.netDNS only
ns3.zehost.netDNS only
ns4.zehost.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.stackmail.com
SOA:Serial: 1693904449, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:173ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot detection. No CMS or backend technologies are identifiable from the provided content. The site is currently blocked behind a security verification page, limiting performance and accessibility analysis. No SEO or accessibility features are detectable. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. The technical implementation is basic and focused primarily on security verification rather than content delivery.
Analyze Another Website