Skip to main content

Is lattice.fund a Scam? Security Check Results - Lattice Reviews

lattice.fund favicon

Is lattice.fund Safe? Security Analysis for Lattice

Check if lattice.fund is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WebflowjQuery 3.5.1GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)SplitType.jsGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:50:30 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Lattice is an early-stage crypto venture fund focused on partnering with crypto founders from day one, helping them build sustainable foundations. Established since 2017, the company positions itself as a knowledgeable and experienced investor in the blockchain and crypto technology sector. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, showcasing portfolio companies and team experience, targeting crypto startups and founders. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP and SplitType for animations, and it leverages Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, providing a smooth user experience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially relevant for GDPR. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or malformed queries, which is common in crypto domains but slightly reduces trust. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WebflowjQuery 3.5.1GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)SplitType.jsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Lattice operates as a specialized venture capital fund in the crypto space, focusing on early-stage investments. Its competitive advantage lies in its early involvement with founders since 2017 and a curated portfolio of recognized crypto projects. The business model revolves around equity investments and strategic support to blockchain startups. The target customers are crypto founders and early-stage projects seeking funding and mentorship. The company maintains a lean size with a small team, emphasizing quality over quantity. The partnership ecosystem includes notable crypto companies featured on the site. The website content and design reinforce a strong brand identity and market positioning within the crypto investment niche.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@lattice.fund

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive information. However, it lacks several security best practices such as security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps. No known vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. The site would benefit from enhanced security transparency and formalized policies to improve trust and compliance, especially given the crypto industry’s heightened security expectations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lattice

Description:

Lattice is an early-stage crypto venture fund that helps founders build sustainable foundations. Our team has been backing founders from day one since 2017.

Key Services:
Early-stage crypto venture fundingSupporting founders in building sustainable foundations
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowjQuery 3.5.1GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)SplitType.jsGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Webflow CMS
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and external resources)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.lattice.fund ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:chelsea@lattice.fund
Forensic Reports:chelsea@lattice.fund

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 36 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:16.16.119.222, 13.49.111.177, 51.21.126.187
Name Servers:
dilbert.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
liz.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382598243, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.lattice.fund ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern and scalable platform (Webflow) with advanced front-end animation libraries (GSAP, SplitType) enhancing user engagement. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a structured approach to data collection. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices, with good accessibility features such as focus outlines and text rendering optimizations. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries. However, the lack of explicit security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms represents technical gaps that could be addressed to improve overall site robustness and regulatory adherence.
Analyze Another Website