Skip to main content

Is latvianfacts.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Latvijas Fakti Reviews

S

Is latvianfacts.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Latvijas Fakti

Check if latvianfacts.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviamedium
Bootstrap 4.1.3jQuery 3.4.1jQuery UI 1.12.0Chart.js 2.8.0Popper.js 1.14.3+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:34:06 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA Latvijas Fakti is a Latvian market and sociological research agency established in 1991, providing comprehensive research services including public opinion polling, social, economic, and political studies. The company is co-owned by Finnish firm Taloustutkimus Oy since 1998, indicating international collaboration. The website presents detailed service descriptions, interactive data visualizations, and maintains a professional appearance with consistent branding. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Chart.js, ensuring good mobile responsiveness and user experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is supported by a GDPR-aligned privacy policy and cookie banner. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, slightly reducing trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 4.1.3jQuery 3.4.1jQuery UI 1.12.0Chart.js 2.8.0Popper.js 1.14.3Slick Carousel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets businesses and organizations in Latvia requiring market and sociological research services. Its business model revolves around providing tailored research solutions from study design to data analysis and reporting. The partnership with Taloustutkimus Oy enhances its market position and credibility. The website content and service offerings indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on quality and client service. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly via contact forms or internal processes. The company leverages partnerships with technology and hosting providers for website development and maintenance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The use of third-party libraries is modern but should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve site security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Latvijas Fakti

Description:

SIA “Latvijas Fakti” is a private research company founded in 1991, conducting market and sociological research including public opinion polls, social, economic, political, media, and market studies for public and private sectors. Since 1998, it is co-owned by Finnish market research company Taloustutkimus Oy.

Key Services:
Market researchSociological researchPublic opinion pollingConsultationsData collection and analysisReporting and presentations
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 4.1.3jQuery 3.4.1jQuery UI 1.12.0Chart.js 2.8.0Popper.js 1.14.3Slick Carousel
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by external HTTPS links)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive charts.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:178.16.25.103
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: sa1.serveris.lv
20: sa2.serveris.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:201ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap 4.1.3, jQuery, Chart.js for data visualization, and Slick Carousel for sliders. The site is mobile responsive and provides interactive content such as charts and tabs. No CMS signatures were detected, suggesting a custom or less common CMS or static site generation. Performance is moderate with reliance on CDN-hosted libraries. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit technical security configurations.
Analyze Another Website