Is lavialibera.it Safe? Security Analysis for LA VIA LIBERA SRL - IMPRESA SOCIALE
https://lavialibera.itCheck if lavialibera.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Lavialibera.it is the digital edition of a bimonthly magazine and online newspaper focused on social justice topics such as mafia, corruption, ecology, and migration. It operates as a small-sized media entity based in Italy, with strong partnerships with organizations like Libera and Gruppo Abele. The website offers subscription services, newsletters, and donation options to support its mission. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Owl Carousel, with analytics via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional content. Security posture is good with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, though security headers could be enhanced. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with explicit consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The website positions itself as a niche media outlet specializing in investigative journalism on social and political issues. Its business model relies on subscriptions, donations, and partnerships with non-profit organizations. The target audience is socially conscious Italian readers interested in anti-mafia and ecological topics. The site demonstrates consistent branding and content quality, with a clear editorial focus. Partnerships with Libera and Gruppo Abele enhance credibility and reach. The presence of donation and subscription mechanisms indicates diversified revenue streams. The site’s longevity since 2019 and domain registration consistency support its legitimacy and market presence.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (2)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
Lavialibera.it maintains a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. The site implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could enhance security maturity. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency measures.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
LA VIA LIBERA SRL - IMPRESA SOCIALE
lavialibera is an editorial project by Libera and Gruppo Abele. It is a bimonthly magazine and an online newspaper covering topics such as mafia, corruption, ecology, and migrations.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- DNSSEC enabled
- Cookie consent mechanism implemented
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professional online magazine focused on social justice and investigative journalism.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 89 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
Unregistered MX Record
HIGHMX record points to unregistered domain: alt4.aspmx.l.google.co
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about lavialibera.it
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published