Skip to main content

Is layer.swiss a Scam? Security Check Results - Layer Reviews

layer.swiss favicon

Is layer.swiss Safe? Security Analysis for Layer

https://layer.swiss

Check if layer.swiss is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologySwitzerlandsmall
Matomo Tag ManagerFramer (website generator)Google Fonts (Inter, Space Grotesk, Fragment Mono)
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:56:45 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Layer is a Swiss-based technology service provider specializing in advanced and digital analytics to deliver data-driven customer and user insights. The company positions itself as a partner guiding businesses through complex user and customer data to enable data-driven decision-making. The website is professionally designed using modern tools such as Framer and incorporates Matomo analytics for user tracking. However, it lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as visible contact information, which impacts compliance and transparency. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration. Overall, the website is accessible and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security measures.

Detected Technologies

Matomo Tag ManagerFramer (website generator)Google Fonts (Inter, Space Grotesk, Fragment Mono)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Layer operates in the technology sector focusing on analytics services that support businesses in understanding customer journeys and user behavior. Its business model revolves around consulting and analytics services, targeting companies seeking to leverage data for improved customer insights. The company appears to be small-sized and based in Switzerland, with no public parent or subsidiary information. The website content is consistent and relevant to its market positioning but lacks trust signals such as certifications or testimonials. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for small tech firms and does not raise immediate concerns.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (3)

c*****@layer.swiss
k*****@layer.swissErstgespr
0*****@layer.swissServices

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level of the website is moderate. HTTPS is presumably enabled (given the URL scheme), but no security headers were detected in the provided data, which is a gap in best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not present, reducing transparency. The use of Matomo analytics suggests some control over data collection, but privacy compliance is poor due to missing policies. Overall, the site should improve security headers, privacy disclosures, and incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Layer

Description:

Datengestützte Insights entlang Ihrer Customer Journey - Layer führt Sie zielorientiert durch die Vielschichtigkeit Ihrer Nutzer- und Kundendaten mithilfe von Advanced und Digital Analytics, um eine datengetriebene Arbeitsweise zu ermöglichen.

Key Services:
Advanced AnalyticsDigital AnalyticsCustomer Journey AnalysisUser Data Insights
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Matomo Tag ManagerFramer (website generator)Google Fonts (Inter, Space Grotesk, Fragment Mono)
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Marketing Tools:
Matomo Tag Manager
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

45/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: 5GCJVE7C2NC2C6ZFZXKBKCYCI2DS22L5ZR5ONHPUB4H2MTTWVOCQ.MX-VERIFICATION.GOOGLE.COM

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 1 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
high(0 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:35.71.142.77, 52.223.52.2
Name Servers:
ns1.cyon.ch
ns2.cyon.ch
MX Records:
1: SMTP.GOOGLE.COM
15: 5GCJVE7C2NC2C6ZFZXKBKCYCI2DS22L5ZR5ONHPUB4H2MTTWVOCQ.MX-VERIFICATION.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 2024022000, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:140ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design and development platform, and uses Matomo Tag Manager for analytics. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, ensuring good typography. The site appears mobile optimized and has good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced performance optimizations detected. Accessibility is basic, with no explicit ARIA or accessibility features noted. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not provided, limiting full technical assessment.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about layer.swiss

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website