Skip to main content

Is layer2financial.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Layer2 Financial Inc Reviews

layer2financial.com favicon

Is layer2financial.com Safe? Security Analysis for Layer2 Financial Inc

Check if layer2financial.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Statesmedium
Webflow CMSjQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerLinkedIn Insight TagLottie animations+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:59:10 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Rail.io, operated by Layer2 Financial Inc, is a mature fintech company founded in 2012, specializing in global B2B payment infrastructure that integrates fiat and stablecoin systems. Their platform targets businesses, banks, and fintech platforms, offering fast, compliant, and scalable payment solutions via a single API. The company positions itself as a leader in modern money movement with significant annual processing volume and multiple banking partnerships. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries and analytics integrations, hosted via Cloudflare, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are absent. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and terms of service present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and business-focused, with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSjQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerLinkedIn Insight TagLottie animationsCloudflare DNS and registrar

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Rail.io operates in the fintech sector, focusing on cross-border payments leveraging stablecoins and fiat currency infrastructure. Their business model is B2B SaaS/API-based, targeting payment clients and banking partners globally. The company demonstrates competitive advantages through fast settlement times, redundancy in banking partnerships, and compliance registrations (FINCEN, FINTRAC). Revenue streams likely include transaction fees and platform usage. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple banks and regulated entities. Growth indicators include a decade-long domain age and a professional web presence. Strategic observations suggest a focus on scalability, compliance, and future-ready payment solutions.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers, and domain transfer restrictions. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which is a gap in responsible disclosure practices. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by adding explicit policies and DNSSEC.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Layer2 Financial Inc

Description:

Rail connects fiat and stablecoin infrastructure to move money instantly, globally, and compliantly — payments built for businesses, banks, and fintech platforms.

Key Services:
Cross-border paymentsStablecoin on/off rampAccounts payable and receivable solutionsTreasury managementRemittanceContractor/freelancer payments
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSjQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerLinkedIn Insight TagLottie animationsCloudflare DNS and registrar
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn Insight TagGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing Tools:
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.wpcloud.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 24 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(306 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:16.16.119.222, 13.49.111.177, 51.21.126.187
Name Servers:
chan.ns.cloudflare.com
lynn.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2380322484, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:76ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.wpcloud.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Lottie for animations. It integrates Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, providing robust performance and security features. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility practices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were observed. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security and enhance privacy compliance mechanisms.
Analyze Another Website