Skip to main content

Is layout.software a Scam? Security Check Results - layout.software Reviews

L

Is layout.software Safe? Security Analysis for layout.software

Check if layout.software is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsPostHog analyticsIntercom chat widget
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:44:09 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website layout.software is intended to provide software tools for discovering, designing, and shipping UI components faster without coding. However, the current site is non-functional due to a client-side application error, resulting in no visible content or user interaction. The technical infrastructure is based on modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, with analytics via PostHog and user engagement through Intercom chat. Despite this, the site lacks critical compliance and security elements such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information. The WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, which raises concerns about domain ownership transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is currently not suitable for professional or business use until these issues are resolved.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsPostHog analyticsIntercom chat widget

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business appears to target developers, designers, and product teams seeking to accelerate UI component development through a SaaS model. The market positioning and competitive advantages cannot be assessed due to lack of content and business information. The absence of contact details and compliance policies limits credibility and customer trust. The company seems small and technology-focused but lacks visible growth indicators or partnership disclosures. The presence of bankside.partners as an external domain may indicate a financial or business services relationship, but this is not confirmed.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to the absence of visible security headers, lack of privacy and cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The site uses HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no detailed SSL configuration data is available. The client-side error may expose the site to user experience risks and potential security issues if not addressed. No evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection frameworks is found. The lack of WHOIS transparency further reduces trust. Immediate remediation is recommended to improve security and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve the client-side application error to restore full website functionality.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Discover, design and ship beautiful components faster, without coding

Key Services:
UI component designComponent discoveryComponent shipping without coding
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsPostHog analyticsIntercom chat widget
Frameworks:
Next.js
SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
PostHog
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PostHog
Marketing Tools:
Intercom
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently showing a client-side application error and does not load main content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 71 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.comDNS only
dns2.registrar-servers.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1737029227, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:152ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js and React frameworks, indicating a modern JavaScript single-page application architecture. It integrates PostHog for analytics and Intercom for customer support chat. The site loads multiple font resources from Google Fonts. However, the site currently suffers from a client-side exception that prevents content rendering. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance and accessibility cannot be fully assessed due to the error state. SEO metadata is present but minimal. The technical debt includes lack of error handling and missing compliance features.
Analyze Another Website