Skip to main content

Is lbank.info a Scam? Security Check Results - LBank Reviews

lbank.info favicon

Is lbank.info Safe? Security Analysis for LBank

Check if lbank.info is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/alarge
React 18Next.jsAnt Design iconsGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:02:27 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

LBank is a globally recognized cryptocurrency exchange platform offering spot and futures trading along with token staking services. The website targets global cryptocurrency traders and investors, emphasizing low fees and a broad range of digital assets. The platform uses modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and some best practices observed, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

React 18Next.jsAnt Design iconsGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

LBank operates in the finance sector as a cryptocurrency exchange, competing globally with other exchanges by offering low fees and diverse trading options. The business model revolves around transaction fees, futures trading, and staking services. The platform appears to have a large user base and a consistent brand presence. However, the lack of publicly available company registration or detailed business information limits full assessment of its corporate structure and regulatory compliance. The use of suspicious external domains for content delivery and APIs may indicate complex infrastructure or potential risk areas. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (5)

s*****@lbank.com
s*****@lbank.comBusiness
b*****@lbank.comMarketing
m*****@lbank.comNews
p*****@lbank.comCommunityBy

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern frameworks, which is positive for security. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency for security researchers and users. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency and header implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies prominently on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LBank

Description:

LBank is a globally trusted cryptocurrency exchange for trading Bitcoin, Ethereum, MEME, and other digital assets. We provide secure and reliable Spot and Futures trading with the lowest fees. Stake tokens to earn passive income! Sign up now and start your journey to profits!

Key Services:
Spot tradingFutures tradingToken stakingCryptocurrency investment
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React 18Next.jsAnt Design iconsGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
ReactNext.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by cookie flags)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
LiveChat tracking
Marketing Tools:
LiveChat
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=0"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.com include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:monitor@lbank.com
Forensic Reports:monitor@lbank.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 49 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:172.64.153.253, 104.18.34.3
Name Servers:
addyson.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
devin.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
50: mx3.zoho.com
20: mx2.zoho.com
10: mx.zoho.com
SOA:Serial: 2384918970, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:90ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.com include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using React 18 and Next.js frameworks, indicating a modern and scalable front-end architecture. It leverages Ant Design icons and Google Analytics for UI and tracking respectively. The site loads multiple scripts and stylesheets from domains with randomized subdomains under rerrkvifj.com, which is unusual and may warrant further investigation. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website