Skip to main content

Is ldaca.edu.au a Scam? Security Check Results - Language Data Commons of Australia Reviews

ldaca.edu.au favicon

Is ldaca.edu.au Safe? Security Analysis for Language Data Commons of Australia

Check if ldaca.edu.au is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationAustraliasmall
Hugo static site generatorFontAwesome iconsAnimate.cssAlgolia searchLunr.js+4 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 4:49:17 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Language Data Commons of Australia (LDaCA) is a nationally significant research infrastructure project focused on making language data accessible for academic and non-academic use, with an emphasis on community control and ethical management. Funded by the Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) and the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS), LDaCA integrates diverse language collections including Indigenous languages and regional Pacific languages. The website reflects a well-structured, professionally designed platform targeting researchers, data contributors, and Indigenous communities. Technically, the site is built using the Hugo static site generator and employs modern JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience and search functionality. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though it lacks some security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the domain appears legitimate despite unavailable WHOIS data, supported by clear funding acknowledgements and academic focus.

Detected Technologies

Hugo static site generatorFontAwesome iconsAnimate.cssAlgolia searchLunr.jsLazySizesClipboard.jsSharer.jsKaTeX

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

LDaCA occupies a unique niche as a non-profit research infrastructure entity in the education and technology sectors, focusing on language data preservation and accessibility. Its business model relies on government and research funding, targeting academic institutions, Indigenous communities, and data users. The project demonstrates strong partnerships with ARDC and related language research organizations, enhancing its credibility and reach. The website content and structure indicate a mature project with consistent branding and high-quality resources. Growth potential lies in expanding data collections and community engagement. The absence of commercial advertising and clear contact information aligns with its non-profit status.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

l*****@uq.edu.au

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, indicating a baseline secure posture. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency for security issues. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms, which may pose regulatory risks. The use of modern libraries and static site generation reduces attack surface. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced with formal policies and headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including GDPR compliance details and implement cookie consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Language Data Commons of Australia

Description:

The Language Data Commons of Australia (LDaCA) makes nationally significant language data available for academic and non-academic use and provides a model for continued access with appropriate community control. It integrates collections of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander languages, Australian Englishes, and regional Pacific languages, securing at-risk collections and improving access.

Key Services:
Data portal accessResource provision for data users and contributorsCommunity-controlled data managementResearch and outreach events
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Hugo static site generatorFontAwesome iconsAnimate.cssAlgolia searchLunr.jsLazySizesClipboard.jsSharer.jsKaTeX
Frameworks:
Hugo
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Mailchimp
Marketing Tools:
MailchimpSender.net
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and clear navigation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spf.forwardemail.net include:_spf.google.com -all v=spf1 include:sendersrv.com ?all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.ldaca.edu.au
Issuer:R13
Valid Until:11/28/2025 (82 days)
SANs:ldaca.edu.au, www.ldaca.edu.au

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

40/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:185.199.109.153, 185.199.111.153, 185.199.110.153, 185.199.108.153
AAAA Records:2606:50c0:8003::153, 2606:50c0:8001::153, 2606:50c0:8002::153, 2606:50c0:8000::153
Name Servers:
ns-1138.awsdns-14.org
ns-1755.awsdns-27.co.uk
ns-217.awsdns-27.com
ns-955.awsdns-55.net
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:115ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:sendersrv.com ?all v=spf1 a mx include:spf.forwardemail.net include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Hugo static site generator, leveraging modern front-end libraries including FontAwesome for icons, Animate.css for animations, Algolia and Lunr.js for search functionality, and KaTeX for math rendering. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely due to external scripts and tracking integrations such as Mailchimp and Sender.net. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional and user-friendly experience. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance to reduce technical risks.
Analyze Another Website