Skip to main content

Is lea-lentes.company.site a Scam? Security Check Results - Lightspeed Commerce Inc. Reviews

L

Is lea-lentes.company.site Safe? Security Analysis for Lightspeed Commerce Inc.

Check if lea-lentes.company.site is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyCanadaenterprise
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:07:28 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website for company.site is currently a minimal placeholder with no substantive content, metadata, or user engagement features. The domain is registered to Lightspeed Commerce Inc., a Canadian enterprise-level technology company founded in 2019. The technical infrastructure appears to be hosted on Amazon AWS, but the site lacks modern web features, SEO optimization, and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and published policies. No contact or incident response information is available, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile but requires significant improvements to meet professional, security, and compliance standards.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Lightspeed Commerce Inc. is positioned as an important entity in the technology sector with an enterprise scale. The domain age aligns with the company's founding year, indicating consistency. However, the website lacks business content, making it difficult to assess market positioning, revenue streams, or customer targeting. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the site. The lack of published policies and contact details suggests the website may be under development or used primarily for domain holding rather than active business operations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of the website is low. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers exposes the site to potential risks such as man-in-the-middle attacks and clickjacking. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which limits the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. DNSSEC is not enabled, reducing DNS security. The domain registration is protected against unauthorized transfers, which is a positive indicator. Overall, the security posture requires enhancement to align with industry best practices and compliance requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lightspeed Commerce Inc.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal with only a basic HTML skeleton and no substantive content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:7f22745d@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:7f22745d@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(351 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:108.156.22.35, 108.156.22.27, 108.156.22.41, 108.156.22.39
Name Servers:
ns-1405.awsdns-47.org
ns-1672.awsdns-17.co.uk
ns-244.awsdns-30.com
ns-578.awsdns-08.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is a barebones HTML page with no metadata, scripts, or content. DNS is managed via Amazon AWS name servers, indicating a reliable hosting provider. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The lack of SEO tags, structured data, or analytics suggests the site is not optimized for search engines or user engagement. Performance and accessibility cannot be fully assessed due to minimal content but are likely poor. The technical debt is high, and modernization is needed to support business operations and security.
Analyze Another Website