Skip to main content

Is leahvelleman.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Leah Velleman Reviews

L

Is leahvelleman.com Safe? Security Analysis for Leah Velleman

Check if leahvelleman.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSSJavaScriptGoogle reCAPTCHA v2 (invisible)jQuery
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 4:43:47 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Leah Velleman is a freelance editor specializing in technical, scientific, and humanities content with a Ph.D. in linguistics and 15 years of experience. The website presents a clear portfolio of editorial services including copy editing, substantive editing, information architecture, academic editing, tech editing, and TeX/LaTeX typesetting. The business targets professionals and academics needing specialized editorial support. Technically, the website is built on a custom HTML5 UP template hosted on NearlyFreeSpeech.net, using standard web technologies including jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and professional design, though it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA implemented, but missing important security headers and DNSSEC. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is trustworthy for a small freelance business but could improve security and compliance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSJavaScriptGoogle reCAPTCHA v2 (invisible)jQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates as a small freelance editorial service with a niche focus on linguistics and technical editing. It leverages specialized knowledge to serve academic and tech industry clients. The business model is direct client service without visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content is professional and targeted, but lacks broader marketing or trust signals such as testimonials or certifications. The domain is newly registered in 2024, consistent with a startup freelancer. No contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, relying on a contact form. Social media links are placeholders, indicating limited social presence. The hosting provider NearlyFreeSpeech.net is a low-cost, privacy-respecting host suitable for small sites.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on the contact form, which help protect data in transit and reduce spam. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor DNS security gap. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance risk under GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the security posture is basic and suitable for a small freelance site but should be enhanced to improve resilience and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Leah Velleman

Description:

Freelance editor with a Ph.D. in linguistics and 15 years experience, specializing in tech, science, and humanities editing. Services include copy editing, substantive editing, information architecture, academic editing, tech editing, and TeX/LaTeX typesetting.

Key Services:
Copy editingSubstantive editingInformation architectureAcademic editingTech editingTeX and LaTeX services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSJavaScriptGoogle reCAPTCHA v2 (invisible)jQuery
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form to prevent spam

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal freelance editorial service site with clear service descriptions.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 58 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:leahvelleman.com
Issuer:E5
Valid Until:11/4/2025 (58 days)
SANs:leahvelleman.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(268 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:208.94.116.173
AAAA Records:2607:ff18:80::7230
Name Servers:
ns.phx3.nearlyfreespeech.net
ns.phx8.nearlyfreespeech.net
SOA:Serial: 1717426418, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:166ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple, clean HTML5 UP template with CSS and JavaScript including jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA v2 invisible. Hosting is provided by NearlyFreeSpeech.net with custom name servers. The site is mobile responsive and loads moderately fast but lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features. No CMS or frameworks detected, indicating a static or lightly scripted site. The contact form collects name, email, and message fields and uses reCAPTCHA for spam prevention. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond reCAPTCHA are present, indicating minimal user tracking. The site could benefit from improved SEO metadata, accessibility enhancements, and security header implementation.
Analyze Another Website