Skip to main content

Is leautonomie.it a Scam? Security Check Results - leautonomie.it Reviews

L

Is leautonomie.it Safe? Security Analysis for 403 - Forbidden

Check if leautonomie.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherItalysmall
Google Fonts (Open Sans, Roboto)
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 9:16:14 PM
31
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website leautonomie.it currently serves a 403 Forbidden error page, indicating that access to the content is blocked or restricted. The domain is well-aged, registered since 2006, but the actual website content is inaccessible, preventing any meaningful business or service information extraction. The page contains minimal technical elements, primarily Google Fonts, and lacks any metadata, structured data, or contact information. This severely limits the ability to assess the company's market position or services. Technically, the site shows no evidence of modern security headers or privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies further reduces trust and compliance posture. Overall, the website is not operational for public access, which impacts its digital maturity and user experience negatively.

Detected Technologies

Google Fonts (Open Sans, Roboto)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the 403 Forbidden status, no business intelligence data such as company name, services, or market positioning could be extracted from the website content. The domain age suggests a longstanding presence, but without accessible content or contact details, the business credibility and operational status remain unclear. No partnerships or related domains were identified. The lack of visible business information and policies indicates either a misconfiguration or intentional access restriction.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website lacks visible security headers and does not have DNSSEC enabled, which are basic security best practices. The 403 Forbidden response suggests some access control is in place, but no further security mechanisms or incident response contacts are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Overall, the security posture is weak due to minimal visible protections and lack of transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve the 403 Forbidden error to allow legitimate user access or provide a clear explanation and contact information.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or restricted. No WAF vendor branding detected but content is inaccessible.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Fonts (Open Sans, Roboto)
Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:34.154.57.36 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:zextras@leautonomie.it

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 29 days

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
19 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(29 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:35.214.164.248
Name Servers:
ns0.sele.itDNS only
ns1.sele.itDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.leautonomie.it
SOA:Serial: 2012100316, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:31ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:34.154.57.36 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website's technical footprint is minimal, with only Google Fonts loaded externally. No CMS, analytics, or tracking scripts are detected. The HTML is valid but serves only an error page with no SEO or accessibility optimizations. Mobile optimization is basic due to responsive meta viewport tag, but content is minimal. The domain is registered with a long history but lacks DNSSEC. No hosting provider or platform details are discernible from the content. Performance and technical infrastructure cannot be fully assessed due to blocked content.
Analyze Another Website