Skip to main content

Is legiano.com a Scam? Security Check Results - legiano.com Reviews

L

Is legiano.com Safe? Security Analysis for Legiano

Check if legiano.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherFinlandsmall
Cloudflare DNSGoogle FontsCloudinary CDNHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 8:01:02 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Legiano is a Finnish website established in 2021, with a focus that is not explicitly detailed in the provided content. The website uses modern web technologies including Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, and Cloudinary CDN for media delivery, indicating a moderate level of technical infrastructure. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking access. However, the website lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and does not provide contact information or social media links, which limits its transparency and user trust. Security posture is moderate with no DNSSEC enabled and no security headers detected, suggesting room for improvement in security best practices. Overall, the website appears legitimate but minimal in content and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

Cloudflare DNSGoogle FontsCloudinary CDNHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses Cloudflare DNS, consistent with a legitimate small business presence. The lack of detailed business description, contact details, or certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or business model. The website appears to target a Finnish audience but does not clearly state its services or sector. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The business intelligence is limited due to minimal content and lack of structured data about the company.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS (implied by Cloudflare DNS and modern assets) but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No incident response contacts or security policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing security headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security and privacy policies to improve compliance and trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Cloudflare DNSGoogle FontsCloudinary CDNHTML5CSS3
Frameworks:
Unknown (custom or proprietary)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:carmamail.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_reports@legiano.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(140 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.207.198.122
Name Servers:
kate.ns.cloudflare.com
toby.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2379520694, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:carmamail.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, and Cloudinary CDN for media assets. The HTML content is well-structured with responsive design elements and mobile optimization. However, no CMS or popular frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary build. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and videos. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with limited meta tags and no structured data found. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers which could impact security and trust.
Analyze Another Website