Skip to main content

Is legzdinsunpartneri.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Legzdiņš un partneri Reviews

legzdinsunpartneri.lv favicon

Is legzdinsunpartneri.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Legzdiņš un partneri

Check if legzdinsunpartneri.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
WordPress 6.0.9Divi Theme 4.18.0jQueryGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:58:03 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA Legzdiņš un partneri is a well-established Latvian architecture firm with over 20 years of experience, specializing in architectural design and project planning for residential and commercial buildings including hotels and multi-apartment houses. The company is positioned as a leader in the Latvian architecture sector, serving both private individuals and businesses. Their website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, reflecting a professional and modern digital presence. The site is mobile-optimized and includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting full domain trust assessment. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich, but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.0.9Divi Theme 4.18.0jQueryGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the Real Estate sector, focusing on architectural services. Their business model revolves around providing design and project planning services for various building types. The firm has a strong market position in Latvia, supported by a portfolio of completed projects and participation in architectural competitions. The target customers include private individuals and companies requiring architectural expertise. The website content and structure support their professional image, though the absence of detailed privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@legzdinsunpartneri.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the analysis. The absence of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited formal security governance. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security headers and privacy enhancements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Legzdiņš un partneri

Description:

Arhitektu birojs "Legzdiņš un partneri" is a Latvian architecture and design firm with over 20 years of experience, recognized as a leader in the architecture and project design sector in Latvia. They specialize in building design including hotels, multi-apartment houses, and public buildings, serving both private individuals and companies.

Key Services:
Architectural designProject planningBuilding design for hotelsMulti-apartment residential buildingsPublic buildings
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.0.9Divi Theme 4.18.0jQueryGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks:
Divi WordPress Theme
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content about architectural services.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.221 +a +mx +ip4:85.31.97.21 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.221
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071600, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:137ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.221 +a +mx +ip4:85.31.97.21 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.0.9 with the Divi theme version 4.18.0, a widely used and supported CMS and theme combination. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the provided HTML. However, no advanced accessibility features or ARIA roles were identified, suggesting basic accessibility compliance. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details were not discernible from the data.
Analyze Another Website