Skip to main content

Is leme.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - leme.lv Reviews

L

Is leme.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if leme.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2BitNinja security
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:50:32 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website leme.lv is currently inaccessible to normal visitors due to a security CAPTCHA challenge page implemented by BitNinja, a cybersecurity service. This page is designed to block automated or malicious traffic and requires users to complete a CAPTCHA to proceed. As a result, no business or product information is available on the site, and the content is limited to security validation messaging. The technical infrastructure includes legacy CMS indicators (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 meta tags) and modern tracking technologies such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The security posture shows some strengths in using BitNinja and reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation but lacks visible security headers and privacy policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting trust verification. Overall, the site is in a blocked state, preventing comprehensive analysis of business and security details.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2BitNinja security

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the blocking by BitNinja, no direct business intelligence can be gathered from the website content. There are no contact details, privacy policies, or company information presented. The presence of BitNinja suggests a focus on security, but the outdated CMS meta tags indicate potential legacy infrastructure. The target audience appears to be general web visitors attempting to access the site. No partnerships or related domains are identified from the content. The lack of accessible business information limits insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or growth indicators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate with the use of BitNinja's greylist and Google reCAPTCHA v2 to prevent automated malicious access. However, the absence of visible security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and lack of privacy or cookie policies are notable gaps. The SSL/TLS configuration could not be assessed from the provided data. The site does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the visible content, but the legacy CMS versions may pose risks if still in use. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. Overall, the security measures focus on access control but lack transparency and comprehensive security best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and expose comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The website content is blocked by BitNinja security service with a CAPTCHA challenge to prevent automated or malicious access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page designed to block automated or malicious traffic. It does not provide business or product information.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2BitNinja security
Frameworks:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5 (meta tags only)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2
  • BitNinja greylist IP blocking

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently blocked by a security CAPTCHA challenge from BitNinja.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:95.211.208.241
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: leme.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025073001, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:114ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS meta tags indicating Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, suggesting outdated infrastructure. Modern tracking technologies like Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated. The site is protected by BitNinja's security service, which presents a CAPTCHA challenge to visitors, blocking direct content access. The page is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO features. No hosting provider information is discernible. The performance is moderate, but the blocking mechanism impacts user experience and content availability. Technical debt is evident due to legacy CMS references and missing modern security headers.
Analyze Another Website