Skip to main content

Is letskeepitreal.com a Scam? Security Check Results - letskeepitreal.com Reviews

letskeepitreal.com favicon

Is letskeepitreal.com Safe? Security Analysis for Keep it real — Raptive

Check if letskeepitreal.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:39:57 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at https://raptive.com/keepitreal/ appears to be inaccessible or blocked by a Web Application Firewall (WAF), likely Cloudflare, as indicated by the repetitive LinkedIn Insight scripts and lack of substantive content. Due to this, no meaningful business, contact, or policy information could be extracted. The domain registration data shows a well-established domain registered since 2010 with Amazon Registrar, Inc., consistent with hosting on AWS infrastructure. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of visible security headers or policies in the accessible content suggest areas for improvement in security posture. The website heavily utilizes LinkedIn Insight for tracking and marketing purposes, indicating a focus on digital marketing analytics. Overall, the site’s content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility cannot be properly assessed due to content blocking, resulting in a low AI score.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence data could be extracted from the accessible content. The domain age and registrar suggest an established presence, but no company name, description, or services are visible. The heavy use of LinkedIn Insight scripts suggests marketing and lead generation activities. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or certifications are identifiable from the data provided.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is difficult to evaluate fully due to content blocking. The domain uses HTTPS and has domain status protections (clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited), which are positive indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers or explicit security policies are visible. The presence of a WAF indicates some level of security protection, but it also limits transparency. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Improve website accessibility by configuring WAF to allow security scanners or legitimate crawlers to access full content.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Cloudflare Detected

The HTML content is dominated by repeated LinkedIn Insight scripts and minimal actual page content, indicating a likely WAF or security challenge page blocking full content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
LinkedIn Insight
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing Tools:
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible or blocked by a WAF/security mechanism.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:emsd1.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1032-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+ukyi9qfqdjn@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

37/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(292 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.10, 141.193.213.11
Name Servers:
ns-11.awsdns-01.com
ns-1495.awsdns-58.org
ns-1739.awsdns-25.co.uk
ns-788.awsdns-34.net
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:51ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:emsd1.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on AWS infrastructure as indicated by the registrar and name servers. The HTML content is minimal and dominated by LinkedIn Insight tracking scripts, suggesting a marketing focus but poor content delivery or blocking by security mechanisms. No CMS or frameworks are detectable from the accessible content. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The domain is well-aged and protected against unauthorized changes but lacks DNSSEC.
Analyze Another Website