Is lfb.it Safe? Security Analysis for Luigi F. Bona
Check if lfb.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website www.lfb.it is a personal or small-scale cultural site managed by Luigi F. Bona, focusing on artistic and historical content related to Italy and Europe, with references to the year 1968 and various cultural themes. The site appears to serve a niche audience interested in cultural heritage and non-profit organizations, with no evident commercial business model or large-scale operations. The website content is basic and primarily informational, with links to related cultural and non-profit entities. From a technical perspective, the website uses older web technologies including XHTML 1.0 Transitional and iso-8859-1 charset. It includes basic CSS and JavaScript, notably a ShinyStat analytics script for visitor tracking. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows limited mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could benefit from modernization. Security posture is weak, with no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no contact or incident response information. The site does not appear to collect personal data via forms or other means, but the lack of security best practices and compliance documentation is a concern. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected, and the site is safe for general audiences. Overall, the website is low risk but would benefit from implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, improving technical infrastructure, and providing clear contact and security information to enhance trust and compliance.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The website represents a personal or cultural project by Luigi F. Bona, with a focus on Italian and European cultural themes. It operates in the 'Other' industry category, likely as a non-commercial or hobbyist site. The market positioning is niche, targeting cultural enthusiasts and non-profit supporters. There is no evidence of revenue streams or commercial partnerships beyond links to non-profit organizations. The business model appears informational and archival. The site has a small scale and long history since 2000, indicating stability but limited growth or modernization. Partnerships with cultural and non-profit entities are evident through external links. The lack of modern digital marketing or e-commerce features suggests limited commercial ambitions.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website's security posture is minimal. There is no indication of HTTPS usage or security headers, which exposes users to potential risks in data transmission. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site does not appear to collect user data via forms, reducing exposure but also limiting user engagement. The use of ShinyStat analytics implies some user tracking without visible consent mechanisms. Overall, the site lacks modern security best practices and compliance measures, representing a moderate security risk primarily due to outdated technology and missing protections.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement HTTPS across the entire website to secure data transmission and improve user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Luigi F. Bona
Personal or small-scale website related to Luigi F. Bona, featuring cultural and artistic content including references to Italy, Europe, 1968, schools, universal exhibitions, magazines, and fandom.
basic
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
poor
basic
basic
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a personal/cultural site with minimal commercial or business focus.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM11 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings