Skip to main content

Is lfdf.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds Reviews

lfdf.eu favicon

Is lfdf.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds

Check if lfdf.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG images
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:21:59 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Latvian Forest Development Fund (LFDF) operates as an investment fund specializing in the acquisition and enhancement of forest properties across Latvia. The company targets investors seeking profitable, sustainable, and secure investment opportunities in the forestry sector. LFDF positions itself as a niche player with strategic partnerships, notably with Debitum Investments, to facilitate investment access. The website content is professionally presented, emphasizing strong financial performance, market growth potential, and sustainability. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript and tracking technologies, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks some security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the business credibility is high with clear contact information and trust signals such as capital repayment rates and institutional investor presence.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG images

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

LFDF operates in the real estate and energy sectors, focusing on forestry assets in Latvia. The business model revolves around acquiring forestland, enhancing its value, and offering investment opportunities through a partnered platform. The market position is that of a specialized fund with growth ambitions to expand its portfolio significantly by 2026. The company benefits from Latvia's strong forestry sector, political stability, and legal protections. Partnerships with platforms like Debitum Investments and presence of institutional investors enhance credibility and market reach. The target customers are investors interested in low-volatility, sustainable asset classes. Growth indicators include increasing land values, high timber demand, and strategic expansion plans.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@lfdf.eu

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712647****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. Privacy compliance is partial; while a privacy policy exists, cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which is a GDPR compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with better header implementation, transparency, and user privacy controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds

Description:

Latvian Forest Development Fund (LFDF) specializes in acquiring and enhancing forest properties across Latvia, offering investors profitable and sustainable opportunities within Latvia’s forestry sector.

Key Services:
Forestland acquisitionForestland enhancement and managementInvestment opportunities via Debitum Investments platform
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG images
Platforms:
Debitum Investments (investment platform partner)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on Latvian forestry investment.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:89.111.20.80
Name Servers:
roman.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
sreeni.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: lfdf-eu.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2378749458, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager scripts for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags including Open Graph for social sharing. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. The technical stack is relatively simple, focusing on content delivery and user engagement through external investment platforms. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. No forms are present on the main page, reducing attack surface but also limiting direct data collection.
Analyze Another Website