Skip to main content

Is lgfonds.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Ļūmaņu ģimenes fonds Reviews

lgfonds.lv favicon

Is lgfonds.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Ļūmaņu ģimenes fonds

Check if lgfonds.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitLatviasmall
jQuery 2.2.4Fancybox 3BannerplayResponsiveVideos
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:07:24 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Ļūmaņu ģimenes fonds is a Latvian non-profit charitable organization founded in 2023, focused on supporting talented children and youth in Vecumnieki as well as providing aid to Ukrainian refugees and the Ukrainian army. The organization operates as a public benefit entity and actively engages in fundraising and community support. The website presents a clear mission and target audience, with social media channels on Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram to enhance outreach. Technically, the site is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging jQuery and other JavaScript libraries, and is hosted via AWS Cloudfront CDN, providing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, which impacts its compliance posture. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.2.4Fancybox 3BannerplayResponsiveVideos

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization positions itself as a small, community-focused non-profit with a clear charitable mission related to local youth and Ukraine support. Its business model relies on donations and community engagement, with no commercial activities evident. The presence on multiple social media platforms supports community outreach and trust building. The lack of detailed contact information and absence of formal policies may limit donor confidence. The organization appears to be in early stages of growth, with potential to expand its digital presence and formalize compliance and security practices to strengthen credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Current security posture is basic with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may hinder timely handling of security issues. The site uses standard JavaScript libraries without known vulnerabilities but lacks advanced security controls. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS enforcement, security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security maturity and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and enforce secure connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ļūmaņu ģimenes fonds

Description:

Bezpeļņas organizācija, labdarības fonds ar oficiāli piešķirtu sabiedriskā labuma organizācijas statusu. Fonds dibināts 2023.gada martā, sākotnēji atbalstot Vecumnieku talantīgos bērnus un jauniešus, vēlāk fokusējoties uz atbalstu bēgļiem un Ukrainas armijai. Fonds ir bezpeļņas organizācija, kas turpina būt aktīvi ziedotāji un administratīvo darbu veicēji.

Key Services:
Ziedojumu vākšanaAtbalsts Ukrainas bēgļiemAtbalsts Ukrainas armijaiAtbalsts vietējai kopienai un talantīgiem bērniem
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.2.4Fancybox 3BannerplayResponsiveVideos
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:lgfonds.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/11/2025 (42 days)
SANs:lgfonds.lv, *.lgfonds.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.2.155, 172.67.129.90
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3031::6815:29b, 2606:4700:3031::ac43:815a
Name Servers:
kanye.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
tricia.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2375823596, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:215ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Mozello CMS and uses jQuery 2.2.4 along with Fancybox and other JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, which supports good content delivery performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design features. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and canonical link present. Accessibility features are minimal but present. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The technical stack is modern enough for a small non-profit but could be improved with updated libraries and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website