Is lianlianpay.com Safe? Security Analysis for 连网（杭州）信息技术有限公司
Check if lianlianpay.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
LianLianPay operates as a Chinese payment services provider focusing on domestic and cross-border payment solutions. The website presents basic information about their services including network payment, account services, and aggregation services. The company is identified as 连网（杭州）信息技术有限公司 with official Chinese ICP and public security registration numbers, indicating a legitimate business presence in China. However, the lack of WHOIS registration data for the domain www.lianlianpay.com raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency. Technically, the website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Nuxt.js and includes Alibaba icon fonts. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, but it lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, and no analytics or tracking technologies are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS verification details, security headers, and privacy policies suggests a low to moderate security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The domain's WHOIS inconsistency is a critical concern that impacts overall trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional but minimalistic with moderate business credibility. Strategic improvements in domain registration transparency, security headers, privacy compliance, and contact information disclosure are recommended to enhance trust and security posture.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
LianLianPay positions itself as a significant player in the Chinese payment services market, offering both domestic and cross-border payment solutions. The company targets businesses requiring payment processing services, including e-commerce and retail sectors. The presence of official ICP and public security registrations supports regulatory compliance within China. The business model revolves around providing network payment, account management, and aggregation services, likely generating revenue through transaction fees and service subscriptions. The website's minimal content and lack of detailed business disclosures limit deeper insights into revenue streams or partnerships. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The company appears to maintain a focused service offering with a straightforward digital presence.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic security posture with no detected WAF or blocking mechanisms. However, critical security best practices such as HTTPS enforcement confirmation, security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and privacy policies are missing or not detectable. The absence of contact information for incident response or security reporting reduces transparency and readiness for security incidents. No evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data was found in the HTML content. The domain WHOIS data absence is a significant security and trust concern, as it impedes verification of domain ownership and legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for substantial improvement in compliance and transparency.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
连网（杭州）信息技术有限公司
LianLianPay Website.
basic
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
basic
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Complex SPF record
LOWToo many include statements can cause lookup limits
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings