Skip to main content

Is liepaja2027.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - liepaja2027.lv Reviews

L

Is liepaja2027.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Liepāja2027

Check if liepaja2027.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentLatviasmall
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1WPML (multilingual plugin)Instagram Feed plugin
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:44:20 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Liepāja2027 is a cultural initiative website promoting the European Capital of Culture 2027 project for Liepāja and surrounding municipalities in Latvia. The site provides information about cultural events, artistic vision, and regional engagement, targeting residents and visitors interested in cultural activities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and offers good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the site appears legitimate and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1WPML (multilingual plugin)Instagram Feed plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website positions itself as a regional cultural promoter backed by local municipalities, focusing on event organization and community involvement. It leverages partnerships with regional tourism sites and cultural institutions. The business model is non-commercial, centered on cultural promotion and public engagement. The target audience includes local residents, tourists, and cultural enthusiasts. The site demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, supporting its role as a trusted regional cultural platform.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

b*****@liepaja2027.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to enhance security. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Liepāja2027 is a cultural initiative focused on Liepāja and surrounding regions (Dienvidkurzemes and Kuldīgas novads) promoting cultural events, artistic vision, and community engagement in the context of European Capital of Culture 2027.

Key Services:
Cultural event promotionArtistic program presentationCommunity engagementTourism information
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1WPML (multilingual plugin)Instagram Feed plugin
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by WPML cookie script)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based cultural project site for Liepāja 2027 European Capital of Culture.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 71 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:85.254.50.55
Name Servers:
ns1.it-lideris.cloudDNS only
ns2.it-lideris.cloudDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025011376, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:53ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with jQuery and WPML for multilingual support. It uses Instagram Feed plugin and custom fonts loaded via CSS. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features like font size and contrast controls. Performance is moderate, with no heavy tracking or advertising scripts detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website