Is liepinsnafta.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Liepiņš Nafta
Check if liepinsnafta.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Liepiņš Nafta is a Latvian fuel retail company operating multiple fuel stations in Riga, offering gasoline and diesel products. The website provides essential business information including fuel prices, station addresses, client card details, and contact information. The company targets local consumers and businesses requiring fuel services. Technically, the website uses legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.12.4 and Font Awesome 5.15.4, with Google reCAPTCHA integrated for form security. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks advanced technical frameworks or CMS identification. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers and use of outdated libraries posing potential risks. Privacy and cookie policies are present, indicating basic GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security measures.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company operates in the energy sector focusing on retail fuel sales through physical stations in Riga, Latvia. It maintains a client loyalty program and active social media presence on Instagram and TikTok, indicating engagement with modern marketing channels. The business model is straightforward retail with a local market focus. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The website content and contact details support a credible small-sized enterprise. The lack of WHOIS data limits deeper verification but no suspicious patterns are evident. The company could improve competitive positioning by enhancing digital presence and security.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces known vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency on security governance. Privacy and cookie policies are present, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to update libraries, implement security headers, and establish incident response contacts.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Liepiņš Nafta
Liepiņš Nafta operates fuel stations in Latvia offering fuel products such as 95E gasoline and diesel (DD) at multiple locations in Riga. The website provides fuel prices, station addresses, client card information, and contact details.
basic
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- Use of HTTPS (implied by external Google and CDN scripts loaded over HTTPS)
- Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Cloudflare
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 88 days
HSTS Not Enabled
MEDIUMHTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings