Skip to main content

Is lighthouselatvia.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Lighthouse Transitional Care Reviews

lighthouselatvia.org favicon

Is lighthouselatvia.org Safe? Security Analysis for Lighthouse Transitional Care

Check if lighthouselatvia.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitLatviasmall
Squarespace CMSGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerWeglot (translation service)Google Fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:32:26 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Lighthouse Transitional Care is a small non-profit organization based in Latvia focused on supporting former foster youth aged 18-30. The organization provides mentorship, discipleship, and community support to help these youth transition into healthy adulthood. The website is professionally designed using Squarespace, featuring responsive design and clear navigation. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form security. However, the site lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, and no direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which slightly impacts privacy compliance and business credibility scores. The WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which is common for small non-profits and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the site demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, but could improve transparency by publishing security policies and contact information.

Detected Technologies

Squarespace CMSGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerWeglot (translation service)Google Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization occupies a niche market position serving vulnerable former foster youth in Latvia. Its business model is donation and volunteer-driven, with partnerships such as with axiainternational.net for donations. The target audience includes youth in need, volunteers, and donors. The website content and social media presence support community engagement and trust building. The lack of detailed business registration or certification information is typical for small non-profits but could be enhanced for credibility. The organization appears focused on growth through volunteer recruitment and program enrollment.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@lighthouselatvia.orgL

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with HSTS, uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and has a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. No security headers beyond HSTS were explicitly detected, and no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file and incident response information to improve trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good for a small non-profit but has room for improvement in policy transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lighthouse Transitional Care

Description:

Lighthouse Transitional Care is a Christian organization working with care leavers and former foster youth in Riga, Latvia ages 18-30. It equips and empowers former foster youth to thrive in adulthood by providing support, mentorship, and healing from trauma.

Key Services:
Mentorship and discipleship for former foster youthCommunity and family support programsVolunteer engagementEnrollment in support programs
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Squarespace CMSGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerWeglot (translation service)Google Fonts
Platforms:
Squarespace
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is built on Squarespace with modern design and responsive layout

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000"

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAMEORIGIN, SAMEORIGIN"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.wpcloud.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

9 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 26 days

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(6 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:198.49.23.144
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-e1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-e2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-e3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-e4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:55ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.wpcloud.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Squarespace, leveraging its CMS and hosting platform, which provides a stable and secure infrastructure. It uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Weglot for multilingual support. Performance is moderate with optimized images and responsive design. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection on forms. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The technical stack is appropriate for the organization's size and needs, with opportunities to enhance security transparency and accessibility.
Analyze Another Website