Is lighthouseriga.com Safe? Security Analysis for Cinnamon Sally
Check if lighthouseriga.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Light House Riga operates as a hospitality accommodation provider in Riga, Latvia, offering a variety of room types including shared dorms, private, and family rooms. The business emphasizes modern, clean, and safe lodging with amenities such as free wifi, kitchen facilities, and self check-in options. The company is relatively new, founded in 2023, and positions itself as a welcoming accommodation for diverse traveler types. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern tools like Google Analytics and image optimization services. The hosting is provided by Bluehost, consistent with the domain's nameservers. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company targets travelers seeking affordable and flexible accommodation in Riga, leveraging positive online reviews and a modern facility to compete in the hospitality sector. The business model focuses on self-service and convenience, appealing to independent travelers and groups. The presence of a Facebook page indicates engagement with customers via social media. The lack of extensive certifications or privacy policies suggests a small-scale operation focused on direct bookings. Growth potential exists through improved digital presence and compliance enhancements.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS and domain transfer lock. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and formal privacy or incident response policies. Google Analytics is used without visible cookie consent, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. No forms or input fields were detected on the homepage, reducing attack surface. The site should implement security headers, enable DNSSEC, and publish privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and security maturity.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Cinnamon Sally
Accommodation centre in Riga offering modern, clean, and safe rooms including shared dorms, private rooms, and family rooms with amenities such as towels, showers, toilets, free wifi, kitchen, tea, and coffee. Self check-in and self-serving accommodation.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- ClientTransferProhibited domain status
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a WordPress-based hospitality accommodation site for a hostel in Riga, Latvia.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 79 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
CRITICALPort 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL
CRITICALPort 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings