
Is likta.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija (LIKTA)
Check if likta.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
LIKTA (Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija) is a well-established non-profit ICT association in Latvia, founded in 1998. It unites over 140 members from telecommunications and ICT sectors, focusing on advocacy, training, and digital transformation initiatives. The website reflects a professional organization with clear mission and vision statements, active news and events sections, and detailed information about its board and working groups. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, offering good mobile responsiveness and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and structure indicate legitimacy. Overall, the site serves as an authoritative platform for ICT stakeholders in Latvia.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
LIKTA holds a strong market position as the leading ICT association in Latvia, representing a broad spectrum of industry players and professionals. Its business model revolves around non-profit advocacy, education, and coordination of ICT initiatives. The association's partnerships with government bodies and industry players enhance its influence. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, project funding, and government grants. The target audience includes ICT companies, professionals, policymakers, and the general public interested in digital skills and ICT development. Growth indicators include active projects, training programs, and participation in European digital initiatives. The partnership ecosystem is diverse, involving telecom operators, software companies, and public institutions.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (10)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program was found. The site uses standard WordPress plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but could be improved to enhance trust and resilience.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija (LIKTA)
LIKTA is an association founded in 1998 uniting leading telecommunications companies, organizations, and ICT professionals in Latvia, currently with over 140 members. It aims to develop understanding of ICT's impact on productivity, efficiency, and competitiveness at state, business, and societal levels.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured navigation.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 78 days
HSTS Not Enabled
MEDIUMHTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings