Skip to main content

Is likumuizsekotajs.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - likumuizsekotajs.lv Reviews

likumuizsekotajs.lv favicon

Is likumuizsekotajs.lv Safe? Security Analysis for likumuizsekotajs.lv

Check if likumuizsekotajs.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentLatviasmall
Vue.jsZiggy routingJavaScript ES modulesCSS with OKLCH colors
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 3:47:59 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Likumu izsekotājs is a Latvian-focused legal technology service that automates the tracking of legislative changes, specifically targeting decisions made by the Cabinet of Ministers and Saeima sessions. The platform leverages artificial intelligence to match user-defined topics with relevant government decisions, streamlining the monitoring process for organizations such as banks, law firms, and municipalities. The service is currently in a pilot phase, inviting large organizations to participate and provide feedback before public release. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Vue.js and ES modules, delivering a responsive and user-friendly experience. While the site demonstrates good design and content quality, there is room for improvement in security posture, particularly in implementing security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers limits direct communication channels, relying instead on a contact form. From a security perspective, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but lacks several best practices such as security headers and vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS data indicates a Latvian natural person as registrant, consistent with the website's regional focus, though detailed organizational information is not provided. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with no critical vulnerabilities detected but with opportunities to enhance trust and compliance. Strategically, the company should prioritize strengthening its security framework, enhancing privacy compliance, and expanding contact options to build greater trust with its target enterprise audience. These improvements will support its positioning as a reliable legal-tech solution in the Latvian market.

Detected Technologies

Vue.jsZiggy routingJavaScript ES modulesCSS with OKLCH colors

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Likumu izsekotājs operates in a niche segment of the legal technology market, focusing on automating legislative tracking for Latvian government decisions. Its competitive advantage lies in leveraging AI to reduce manual monitoring efforts for organizations heavily impacted by regulatory changes. The business model appears to be B2B SaaS with a pilot program targeting large enterprises and public institutions. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees post-pilot. The company targets sectors such as banking, legal services, and government agencies, indicating a specialized customer base. Growth potential depends on successful pilot outcomes and expansion into broader legislative tracking, including Saeima sessions. The partnership ecosystem is currently limited but may expand with pilot participants. Operationally, the company demonstrates a lean digital presence with modern technology but limited public business information.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website's security maturity is basic, with HTTPS presumably enabled but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy details on the landing page suggests partial GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The lack of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries is positive, but the site would benefit from implementing Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and other headers to mitigate common web threats. The use of modern JavaScript frameworks is a strength but requires ongoing maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small enterprise but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Likumu izsekotājs is a service that automates tracking changes in normative acts, specifically focusing on Latvian Cabinet of Ministers decisions and Saeima sessions. It uses AI to help organizations monitor legislative changes relevant to their interests.

Key Services:
Automated legislative change trackingAI-based topic matchingPilot program for early adopters
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Vue.jsZiggy routingJavaScript ES modulesCSS with OKLCH colors
Frameworks:
Vue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mailersend.net ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

37/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:103.133.1.1
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1758791520, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mailersend.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Vue.js and ES modules, ensuring a responsive and interactive user experience. The use of Ziggy routing indicates a Laravel backend or similar PHP framework, though backend details are not visible. Performance appears moderate with preloading of CSS and JS assets. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available, limiting full technical assessment. Overall, the technical infrastructure is sound but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website