Skip to main content

Is lila.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - LILA Reviews

lila.lv favicon

Is lila.lv Safe? Security Analysis for LILA

Check if lila.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle AnalyticsRank Math SEO+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:59:10 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

LILA is a small local ceramics workshop and creative studio based in Cēsis, Latvia, offering ceramics classes, workshops, and team-building events primarily targeting adults and children interested in creative activities. The website is built on WordPress using modern themes and plugins, including SEO and performance optimizations. It features clear contact information, social media links, and structured data for enhanced search visibility. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks some advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting full domain trust verification. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy image suitable for its local business scope.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle AnalyticsRank Math SEOWP RocketGeneratePress theme

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the creative arts sector, focusing on ceramics education and community engagement. Its business model includes paid courses, workshops, and sales of ceramic products. The company appears to be well-positioned locally with a consistent brand and active content updates. The presence of social media and video content supports marketing efforts. Lack of WHOIS data and some missing compliance features suggest areas for improvement in digital trust and regulatory adherence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

z*****@lila.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712026****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Cookie consent mechanisms are absent, which may affect GDPR compliance. The site uses standard WordPress plugins and themes, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LILA

Description:

Keramikas darbnīca un radošā studija Lila piedāvā keramikas nodarbības, meistarklases un radošās darbnīcas. Māla darbnīca atrodas Cēsīs, pašā centrā.

Key Services:
Keramikas nodarbības pieaugušajiemPāru nodarbībasMeistarklasesKomandas saliedēšanas pasākumiKeramikas darbu pārdošana
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle AnalyticsRank Math SEOWP RocketGeneratePress theme
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Google Site Kit
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based local ceramics studio site with good content and structure.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +mx +a +ip4:172.96.186.133 +include:_spf.arandomserver.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:172.96.186.228
Name Servers:
ns1.hawkhost.comDNS only
ns2.hawkhost.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: lila.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025073000, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:199ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +mx +a +ip4:172.96.186.133 +include:_spf.arandomserver.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with the GeneratePress theme and uses jQuery, Google Analytics, and Rank Math SEO plugin. Performance optimizations include lazy loading and caching via WP Rocket. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format. No hosting provider details were found. The site loads moderately fast and has a clean, professional design. Accessibility is basic but present. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and privacy compliance improvements are recommended.
Analyze Another Website