Skip to main content

Is line.me a Scam? Security Check Results - LY Corporation Reviews

line.me favicon

Is line.me Safe? Security Analysis for LY Corporation

Check if line.me is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyJapanlarge
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerSwiper.js
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:58:30 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

LINE is a prominent technology company operating a widely used messenger application that offers free voice calls and messaging services. The website positions LINE as more than just a messenger app, emphasizing its role as an infrastructure for daily communication. The company targets a broad general audience with downloadable apps available across multiple platforms including iOS, Android, desktop, and Windows Store. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a large user base primarily in Japan and globally.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

LINE holds a strong market position as a leading communication platform with a diversified service ecosystem. Its business model revolves around providing free communication services supplemented by additional digital services. The company maintains official presence on major social media platforms and provides direct download links to official app stores, enhancing user trust and accessibility. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests privacy protection measures typical for large technology firms. No direct contact information is provided on the main site, which is common for large enterprises relying on support portals.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for enhanced security and privacy compliance. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information is found, indicating room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. The absence of exposed sensitive data and the use of privacy protection in WHOIS data are positive indicators. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response information to improve transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LY Corporation

Description:

More than just a messenger app. LINE is new level of communication and the very infrastructure of your life.

Key Services:
Messenger appVoice callsMessagingDownloadable apps for mobile and desktop
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerSwiper.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:naver.com include:spf.naver.jp ip4:203.104.136.0/24 ip4:147.92.128.0/17 include:_spfblock_ext.line.me include:bulk-spf.yahoo.co.jp ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dl_dmarc@linecorp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:147.92.243.206
Name Servers:
ans1.linecorp.comDNS only
ans2.linecorp.comDNS only
ns1.naver.jpDNS only
ns2.naver.jpDNS only
MX Records:
100: mx1-common.line-apps.com
100: mx2-common.line-apps.com
100: mx3-common.line-apps.com
10: mx-common.line-apps.com
SOA:Serial: 1757048586, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:naver.com include:spf.naver.jp ip4:203.104.136.0/24 ip4:147.92.128.0/17 include:_spfblock_ext.line.me include:bulk-spf.yahoo.co.jp ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Swiper.js for UI components. It is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and optimized images. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and cookie consent implementation to meet higher compliance standards.
Analyze Another Website