Skip to main content

Is linguaschools.it a Scam? Security Check Results - Linguaschools Reviews

L

Is linguaschools.it Safe? Security Analysis for Linguaschools

Check if linguaschools.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationItalymedium
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Maps APIjQueryComplyDog cookie consent tool
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:20:18 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Linguaschools is a well-established network of Spanish language schools located in Spain and South America, founded in 2005. The company offers a variety of Spanish courses including intensive, combined, individual, semi-intensive, exam preparation, and online options, targeting students seeking high-quality language education combined with cultural immersion. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides rich content in Italian with multiple language versions available. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, and a cookie consent tool, ensuring GDPR compliance and user tracking transparency. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and formal policies are missing. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the business profile. Overall, the site is trustworthy, user-friendly, and well-positioned in the education sector.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Maps APIjQueryComplyDog cookie consent tool

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Linguaschools holds a strong market position as a leader in Spanish language education with a network of partner sites in multiple languages, enhancing global reach. Their business model focuses on providing personalized language learning experiences with cultural activities, appealing to international students. The company leverages social media and content marketing through an active blog and social channels. The absence of direct email contacts on the site suggests a preference for phone and online portal communications. The company maintains accreditations such as recognition by the Instituto Cervantes, reinforcing credibility. Growth potential is supported by diversified course offerings and online learning options.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (4)

+3464467****
+3493176****
003*******
+3493176****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and a published security.txt file, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and ComplyDog is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for security. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved with formal documentation and enhanced HTTP headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Linguaschools

Description:

Linguaschools è una rete di prestigiose scuole di spagnolo in Spagna e Sud America che offre corsi di vari livelli e tipologie tutto l’anno, tenuti da insegnanti madrelingua con esperienza.

Key Services:
Corsi intensivi di spagnoloCorsi combinatiCorsi individualiCorsi semi-intensiviPreparazione esami DELE, SIELE, ECCSpagnolo onlineAccesso all’universitàCorsi di spagnolo con attività culturali e sportive
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Maps APIjQueryComplyDog cookie consent tool
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
ComplyDog cookie consent tool
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language options.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

43/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:109.71.54.15 +a +mx +ip4:109.71.52.22 +include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1408-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(304 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:159.223.5.94
Name Servers:
ns1.yourwebhoster.comDNS only
ns2.yourwebhoster.comDNS only
ns3.yourwebhoster.nlDNS only
ns4.yourwebhoster.nlDNS only
MX Records:
40: mx40.onlinemailscanner.com
30: mx30.onlinemailscanner.com
10: mx10.onlinemailscanner.com
20: mx20.onlinemailscanner.com
SOA:Serial: 2024082302, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:109ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:109.71.54.15 +a +mx +ip4:109.71.52.22 +include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Google Maps API for interactive maps, and a third-party cookie consent tool (ComplyDog). The site is mobile responsive with lazy loading images and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with some deferred script loading. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. The site lacks some advanced frameworks but maintains good usability and content delivery. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for modernization.
Analyze Another Website