Skip to main content

Is link3.to a Scam? Security Check Results - cyber.co Reviews

C

Is link3.to Safe? Security Analysis for cyber.co

Check if link3.to is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSSGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:22:38 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Link3.to is a technology platform serving the Web3 ecosystem by providing a verified, all-in-one profile platform for Web3 projects, communities, and creators. It aggregates important digital identity resources and integrates native Web3 features such as NFT galleries, token swaps, and official social links. The platform positions itself as a trusted gateway for Web3 organizations and creators, boasting a significant user base and verified organizations. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though it lacks some security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, enhancing trust. Overall, the platform demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSSGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Link3.to operates in the technology sector focused on Web3 digital identity and community engagement. Its business model revolves around providing profile creation and integration services to Web3 entities, enabling enhanced user engagement through native blockchain features. The platform has established partnerships and integrations with notable Web3 services such as Uniswap, CoinMarketCap, and Mirror, indicating a strong ecosystem presence. The target audience includes Web3 projects, communities, and creators seeking verified and aggregated digital profiles. Growth indicators include over 3,400 verified organizations and 680k+ profiles. The parent company, cyber.co, supports the platform, suggesting a solid backing and strategic alignment within the decentralized technology space.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web frameworks, contributing to a secure baseline. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or vulnerability disclosure information, which are critical for compliance and incident response readiness. The lack of explicit contact information for security incidents further limits incident response capabilities. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear areas for enhancement to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

cyber.co

Description:

Link3 is the verified all-in-one profile platform designed for Web3 projects, communities, and creators. It serves as a trusted gateway to Web3 organizations and creators, aggregating important resources on a single verified access point.

Key Services:
Personal profile creationOrganization profile creationIntegration with Web3 features (NFT galleries, token swaps, official links)Aggregation of Web3 resources and social linksNative Web3 integrations (Uniswap, CoinMarketCap, Mirror, etc.)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSSGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 58 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:64.239.123.129, 64.239.109.1
Name Servers:
ns1.vercel-dns.comDNS only
ns2.vercel-dns.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1656757228, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages Next.js and React frameworks, indicating a modern and scalable front-end architecture. It uses Google Analytics for user tracking and performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and CSS. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header configurations. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries, suggesting up-to-date dependencies.
Analyze Another Website