Skip to main content

Is linzag.at a Scam? Security Check Results - LINZ AG für Energie, Telekommunikation, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste Reviews

linzag.at favicon

Is linzag.at Safe? Security Analysis for LINZ AG für Energie, Telekommunikation, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste

Check if linzag.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyAustrialarge
jQuery 1.11.3PrimeFaces (JavaServer Faces component library)OneTrust Cookie ConsentEtracker analytics
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 2:51:29 AM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

LINZ AG is a large multi-utility company based in Linz, Austria, providing essential services including energy supply (electricity, natural gas, district heating), public transportation, telecommunications, and various municipal services such as waste management and water supply. The company serves primarily private customers and the general public in Linz and the surrounding region. The website reflects a well-structured portal offering detailed information and online services related to these sectors. Technically, the website is built using JavaServer Faces with PrimeFaces components, supplemented by jQuery and integrated with OneTrust for cookie consent management and Etracker for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The WHOIS data confirms the domain is registered to a legitimate entity consistent with the business, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences. However, the absence of visible privacy policies, terms of service, and explicit security or incident response policies suggests areas for improvement in compliance and transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, and improving accessibility compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.11.3PrimeFaces (JavaServer Faces component library)OneTrust Cookie ConsentEtracker analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

LINZ AG holds a strong market position as a regional multi-utility provider in Linz, Austria, with a diversified portfolio spanning energy, transportation, telecommunications, and municipal services. The business model focuses on serving private customers and the local community with essential utilities and services. The company leverages digital channels to provide online services such as billing, service requests, and information dissemination. The presence of OneTrust and Etracker indicates an awareness of regulatory compliance and user analytics. Growth opportunities may lie in expanding digital services and enhancing customer engagement. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand and professional online presence, supporting customer trust and operational efficiency.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@linzag.at

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a potential area of vulnerability. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The absence of exposed sensitive data and outdated libraries is positive, but updating JavaScript libraries and implementing additional security headers would strengthen defenses. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a public utility website but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LINZ AG für Energie, Telekommunikation, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste

Description:

Die LINZ AG kümmert sich als Multi-Utility-Anbieter um die Energieversorgung, den öffentlichen Nahverkehr und kommunale Dienste in Linz, Oberösterreich.

Key Services:
Energy supply (Strom, Erdgas, Fernwärme)Public transportationWaste management and recyclingWater and wastewater servicesTelecommunicationsMunicipal services (Bestattung, Friedhöfe, Bäder)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.11.3PrimeFaces (JavaServer Faces component library)OneTrust Cookie ConsentEtracker analytics
Frameworks:
JavaServer Faces (JSF)PrimeFaces
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Etracker
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Etracker
Marketing Tools:
Etracker
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a public utility portal for Linz AG, providing comprehensive services for energy, transport, and municipal needs.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_netblocks1.linzag.at include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1368-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+bknx8vkvq3g@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:195.8.213.85
Name Servers:
ns1.linzag.at
ns2.linzag.at
MX Records:
0: linzag-at.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025081201, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_netblocks1.linzag.at include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a JavaServer Faces framework using PrimeFaces components, with jQuery 1.11.3 for client-side scripting. It integrates OneTrust for cookie consent management and Etracker for analytics tracking. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, but lacks some modern security headers. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load times and resource optimization. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure, supporting usability. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not evident from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could be modernized with updated libraries and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website