Skip to main content

Is lionsairgroup.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Lions Air Group Reviews

lionsairgroup.com favicon

Is lionsairgroup.com Safe? Security Analysis for Lions Air Group

https://lionsairgroup.com

Check if lionsairgroup.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationN/asmall
WordPressBrizy BuilderYouTube Widget APIGoogle Fonts (via fonts.bunny.net)
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 7:19:21 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Lions Air Group is an aviation-related business with a multilingual website targeting an international audience. The company appears to offer air transportation or aviation services, though detailed business information is limited. The website is built on WordPress using the Brizy page builder and integrates YouTube widgets and external fonts. The technical infrastructure is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO features. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible security headers, absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no evident contact information. The domain WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status. Overall, the website is functional and professional in appearance but lacks critical trust and compliance elements.

Detected Technologies

WordPressBrizy BuilderYouTube Widget APIGoogle Fonts (via fonts.bunny.net)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets clients in the aviation sector, likely providing specialized air transport or related services. The multilingual approach suggests a European or global market focus. The business model is service-oriented with no visible e-commerce or direct sales. Lack of detailed company data, certifications, or contact information limits assessment of market position and growth potential. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual and may indicate recent domain registration or privacy concerns. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low. The site lacks essential security headers and visible policies for privacy or incident response. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of contact information for security incidents or data protection officers indicates limited readiness for incident management or compliance with GDPR/NIS2. The use of WordPress requires diligent patching and plugin management to avoid vulnerabilities. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting business intelligence capabilities.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register and verify domain WHOIS information to improve legitimacy and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lions Air Group

Description:

Lions Air Group appears to be a business related to aviation, likely offering services in air transportation or related sectors. The website is multilingual with English and German versions, indicating a European or international target audience. The business model likely involves providing aviation services or products, targeting clients needing air transport or aviation solutions.

Key Services:
Aviation servicesAir transportation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressBrizy BuilderYouTube Widget APIGoogle Fonts (via fonts.bunny.net)
Frameworks:
WordPress CMS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:193.108.137.80
Name Servers:
ch.pro.ioDNS only
nl.pro.ioDNS only
p.dnh.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: lionsairgroup-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024101401, TTL: 1440s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:80ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with Brizy page builder, indicating a modern but common technology stack. External resources include fonts from bunny.net and YouTube API scripts. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a good design quality. However, no advanced SEO or accessibility features were detected. Performance is moderate, likely due to external resource loading and lack of advanced caching or CDN indicators. The absence of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about lionsairgroup.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website