Is live.com Safe? Security Analysis for Microsoft
Check if live.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The analyzed website is the Outlook webmail client hosted under the outlook.live.com subdomain, operated by Microsoft Corporation. It provides email, calendar, and contact management services primarily targeting general users and enterprises. The platform is a key component of Microsoft's productivity suite and integrates with Microsoft 365 services. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure leveraging Microsoft Azure hosting, MSAL.js for authentication, and OAuth 2.0 protocols, ensuring secure and scalable service delivery. The content is minimal in the provided snapshot, focusing on loading and authentication mechanisms rather than visible user content or marketing information. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and modern authentication flows, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are not visible in the provided HTML snippet. Overall, the domain and subdomain are consistent with Microsoft's enterprise domain management practices, though WHOIS data for this subdomain is not publicly available, which is typical for large organizations. The site is safe, professional, and trustworthy with no adult or questionable content detected.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Microsoft Outlook is positioned as a market leader in email and productivity services, serving a broad audience from individual consumers to large enterprises. Its business model is SaaS-based, generating revenue through Microsoft 365 subscriptions and enterprise licensing. The platform benefits from Microsoft's extensive cloud infrastructure and global presence, ensuring high availability and integration with other Microsoft services. The ecosystem includes related domains such as outlook.office.com and login.microsoftonline.com, which handle authentication and service delivery. The lack of visible contact or policy information in the HTML snapshot suggests these are likely hosted on other Microsoft domains or accessible post-login. Microsoft's brand strength and trust indicators are significant competitive advantages, supporting user confidence and adoption.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs strong security practices including HTTPS, OAuth 2.0 authentication, and MSAL.js for secure token management. The use of script integrity attributes and trusted types policies indicates attention to mitigating cross-site scripting risks. However, the absence of visible security headers in the HTML snapshot and lack of published security or incident response policies reduce transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site does not display cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policies in the provided snapshot, which may impact GDPR compliance visibility. Overall, the security posture is robust but could be improved by making security and privacy policies more accessible and explicit.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Microsoft
Outlook is a web-based email client service provided by Microsoft, offering email, calendar, and contact management services primarily targeting individual and business users.
basic
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- Use of HTTPS
- OAuth 2.0 authentication
- MSAL.js for secure token handling
- Content Security Policy implied by trusted types and script integrity attributes
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a Microsoft Outlook webmail client interface.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Ads
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Complex SPF record
LOWToo many include statements can cause lookup limits
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
MTA-STS Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings