Skip to main content

Is livejournal.com a Scam? Security Check Results - livejournal.com Reviews

livejournal.com favicon

Is livejournal.com Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if livejournal.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:01:32 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain livejournal.com is a long-established domain created in 1999 and registered through RU-CENTER, consistent with the known history of the LiveJournal blogging platform. However, the current website content is inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content, indicating that access is blocked or restricted by server or security configurations. Due to this, no metadata, business information, contact details, or policies could be extracted or analyzed. The lack of accessible content severely limits the ability to assess the website's technical infrastructure, security posture, or compliance status. The domain registration data is consistent and legitimate, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers is a minor concern. Overall, the website is currently non-functional or restricted, resulting in a very low AI score and inability to provide meaningful business or security insights.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence data could be extracted due to the blocked website content. The domain's age and registrar information align with the historical LiveJournal service, but no current operational or market positioning data is available. No contact or corporate information is present to assess business model, revenue streams, or partnerships.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error, which may be due to server configuration or security controls. No security headers or SSL configuration details were provided. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security best practice gap. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available. The security posture cannot be fully assessed but is currently poor due to lack of accessible content and missing security controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Investigate and resolve the 403 Forbidden error to restore website accessibility.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content indicating access is blocked or restricted by server configuration or security mechanisms.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:81.19.74.0/24 -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-fb@livejournalinc.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(220 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:81.19.74.0, 81.19.74.1
Name Servers:
ns2.rambler.ru
ns3.rambler.ru
ns4.rambler.ru
ns5.rambler.ru
MX Records:
10: mail.livejournal.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090402, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:32ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:81.19.74.0/24 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a minimal 403 Forbidden error page with no metadata, scripts, or content. No CMS, frameworks, or technologies could be detected. The domain is hosted with name servers under rambler.ru, but no hosting provider details or performance metrics are available. The lack of accessible content indicates either a server-side block or misconfiguration. Technical modernization and remediation are required to restore functionality and enable further analysis.
Analyze Another Website