Skip to main content

Is liveramp.org a Scam? Security Check Results - LiveRamp Reviews

liveramp.org favicon

Is liveramp.org Safe? Security Analysis for LiveRamp

Check if liveramp.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Statesmedium
WebflowjQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerKetch Privacy ManagerBugherd+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:16:27 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

LiveRamp.org is a nonprofit initiative affiliated with LiveRamp, focused on leveraging data and technology to support charitable causes and underserved communities. The website highlights their philanthropic efforts including technology donations, employee engagement in volunteering, and partnerships with other organizations to amplify social impact. The site positions itself as a connector of data and people for good, targeting nonprofits and socially conscious partners. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates privacy management and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and privacy consent mechanisms, though some standard security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with corporate social responsibility goals.

Detected Technologies

WebflowjQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerKetch Privacy ManagerBugherdWistia video embeds

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website serves as a platform to showcase LiveRamp's social responsibility arm, focusing on data-driven philanthropy. It leverages partnerships with organizations like Alliant Insight and ShareThis to extend its impact. The business model is philanthropic and partnership-driven rather than commercial, emphasizing social good over revenue. The target audience includes nonprofits, charitable organizations, and socially responsible businesses. The presence of donation matching and employee volunteering programs indicates a medium-sized organization with a strong internal culture of giving. The site also serves as a communication channel for LiveRamp's broader corporate social responsibility efforts.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager and privacy management scripts to control data collection and user consent, indicating good privacy compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site does not provide a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional security best practices and documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LiveRamp

Description:

LiveRamp.org leverages technology and people across the company and ecosystem to build better connections for a better future by donating technology, investing in causes important to employees, and supporting data-centric initiatives to positively impact underserved communities.

Key Services:
Technology donationInvestment in social causesSupport for data-centric nonprofit initiativesPartnership facilitation
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowjQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerKetch Privacy ManagerBugherdWistia video embeds
Frameworks:
Webflow CMS
Platforms:
Webflow Hosting
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
  • Privacy manager scripts for consent management

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
ShareThis
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(658 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.223.27.102, 13.248.155.104
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
20: eforward5.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward2.registrar-servers.com
15: eforward4.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward1.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward3.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 1604351847, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:37ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, and Ketch privacy management scripts. Video content is embedded via Wistia, enhancing engagement. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing reliable performance and global delivery. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by rich media content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with opportunities for incremental improvements in accessibility and security.
Analyze Another Website