Skip to main content

Is livinglanguages.org.au a Scam? Security Check Results - Living Languages Reviews

livinglanguages.org.au favicon

Is livinglanguages.org.au Safe? Security Analysis for Living Languages

Check if livinglanguages.org.au is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitAustraliasmall
Squarespace CMSGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerSquarespace JavaScript libraries
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:57:39 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Living Languages is a small Australian non-profit organization dedicated to supporting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in maintaining, revitalising, and reclaiming their languages. The organization offers tailored language revitalisation workshops and training programs across remote, regional, and urban areas in Australia. Their services include community-based training, language leadership programs, and sharing circles, positioning them as a specialized entity in Indigenous language preservation. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging standard web technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, some accessibility features are basic, and SEO practices are adequately implemented. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS but lacks several important security headers such as HSTS, Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web threats. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific indicators. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for a niche non-profit organization, though improvements in security headers and privacy compliance would strengthen its posture. The incomplete WHOIS data slightly reduces domain trust but does not outweigh the positive indicators from the website content and contact transparency.

Detected Technologies

Squarespace CMSGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerSquarespace JavaScript libraries

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Living Languages operates in the non-profit sector focused on Indigenous language preservation in Australia. Their market positioning is niche, serving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and language workers. The business model centers on providing educational workshops and training programs tailored to community needs. Revenue streams likely include grants, donations, and possibly government funding. The organization maintains active social media channels to engage stakeholders and promote events. Growth indicators include recent workshops and a 20-year celebration, signaling established presence. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. The organization emphasizes cultural respect and community engagement, which are strategic advantages in their sector.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@livinglanguages.org.au

Phone Numbers (1)

037*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks like protocol downgrade attacks, cross-site scripting, and clickjacking. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR indicators. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are apparent, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and documented policies to improve resilience and trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) header to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Living Languages

Description:

Living Languages supports Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia who are working to maintain, revitalise and reclaim their languages.

Key Services:
Language revitalisation workshopsCommunity-based trainingLanguage leadership programsPaper and Talk sessionsSharing Circles
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Squarespace CMSGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerSquarespace JavaScript libraries
Platforms:
Squarespace
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=0"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:198.49.23.145, 198.185.159.145, 198.185.159.144, 198.49.23.144
Name Servers:
ns1.nameserver.net.au
ns2.nameserver.net.au
ns3.nameserver.net.au
MX Records:
10: livinglanguages-org-au.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024031802, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:399ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on Squarespace, a managed platform providing reliable infrastructure and CMS capabilities. It uses modern web fonts from Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site loads a variety of compressed JavaScript libraries from Squarespace's CDN, indicating optimized asset delivery. Performance is moderate, with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt appears low due to the managed platform, but opportunities exist to enhance security headers and privacy compliance. No legacy or vulnerable libraries were detected in the scripts loaded.
Analyze Another Website