Skip to main content

Is livomezs.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - LIVO mežs SIA Reviews

livomezs.lv favicon

Is livomezs.lv Safe? Security Analysis for LIVO mežs SIA

Check if livomezs.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPress 6.4.5Divi Theme 4.24.2jQuery 3.7.1Supreme Modules Pro for Divi plugin
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:48:45 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

LIVO mežs SIA is a Latvian family-owned forestry company specializing in forest purchasing, full-cycle forest management, timber transportation, and roundwood sales primarily in Latvia and Estonia. The company has demonstrated strong growth, being recognized among the top 100 fastest-growing companies in Latvia in recent years. Their website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with good content quality and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification, but the business information and contact details are consistent and professional. Overall, the company presents a trustworthy and credible online presence suitable for its market segment.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.4.5Divi Theme 4.24.2jQuery 3.7.1Supreme Modules Pro for Divi plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the forestry and transportation sectors, targeting landowners and timber buyers in the Baltic region. Its business model focuses on service provision in forest asset acquisition, management, and logistics. The recognition as a fast-growing company indicates competitive advantages and effective market positioning. The website supports business credibility with clear contact information and social media presence, though it lacks extensive marketing or analytics tools. The company appears focused on organic growth and regional market penetration without heavy reliance on digital marketing.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712203****
+3712233****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

LIVO mežs SIA

VAT Number:

LV40203101815

Registration Number:

LV40203101815

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks several recommended security headers that could enhance protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LIVO mežs SIA

Description:

LIVO mežs is a family-owned forestry business offering forest purchasing, full-cycle forest management, timber transportation, and roundwood realization services primarily in Latvia and Estonia. Founded by a forestry engineer with a legacy in the sector, the company emphasizes quality service and rapid payment.

Key Services:
Forest purchasingFull-cycle forest managementTimber transportationRoundwood realization
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.4.5Divi Theme 4.24.2jQuery 3.7.1Supreme Modules Pro for Divi plugin
Frameworks:
Divi Builder
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.243 +ip4:85.31.97.34 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.243
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: livomezs.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025061900, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:196ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.243 +ip4:85.31.97.34 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Divi theme and related plugins, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. The use of Google Fonts and jQuery libraries is evident. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and the site is mobile responsive. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal but includes canonical and meta tags. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins or themes and lack of advanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website