Skip to main content

Is ljse.si a Scam? Security Check Results - Ljubljanska borza Reviews

ljse.si favicon

Is ljse.si Safe? Security Analysis for Ljubljanska borza

Check if ljse.si is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceSloveniamedium
JavaScriptVue.js (VueChart)Moment.jsGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 11:53:24 AM
74
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Ljubljanska borza is the official Ljubljana Stock Exchange, serving as the primary capital market infrastructure provider in Slovenia. The website offers comprehensive market data, trading information, and statistical reports targeted at investors and financial professionals. The business is well-established with a domain age dating back to 1995, reflecting its longstanding market presence. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and integrates essential services like Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA with user consent managed via Cookiebot. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some advanced security headers are not explicitly confirmed. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses a consent management platform to comply with GDPR. However, it lacks publicly available security policies and incident response contacts, which could enhance trust and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence for a financial institution, with moderate to good technical maturity and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security transparency and contact information publication are recommended to further strengthen its posture.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptVue.js (VueChart)Moment.jsGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHACookiebot

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Ljubljanska borza holds a key market position as Slovenia's main stock exchange, providing critical financial market infrastructure and data services. Its business model revolves around operating trading systems, disseminating market data, and offering statistical insights to market participants. The target audience includes investors, brokers, and financial analysts. The company benefits from a consistent brand and a comprehensive navigation structure that supports user engagement. While no parent or subsidiary companies are identified, the exchange maintains partnerships with major service providers like Google for analytics and Cookiebot for compliance. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on transparency and regulatory compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforcement and integration of consent management for cookies, aligning with GDPR requirements. The use of Google reCAPTCHA adds protection against automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not confirmed, suggesting room for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing formal security documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ljubljanska borza

Description:

Ljubljanska borza is the Ljubljana Stock Exchange, providing market data, trading systems, financial instruments information, and statistical reports related to the Slovenian capital market.

Key Services:
Market data disseminationTrading system operationStatistical reportingData distribution services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptVue.js (VueChart)Moment.jsGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHACookiebot
Frameworks:
Vue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA deferred
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:194.152.205.83 ip4:194.152.205.84 ip4:194.152.205.13 ip4:213.164.9.10 ip4:193.0.244.250 ip4:193.0.244.19 ip4:193.109.227.66 ip4:91.235.242.52 ip4:91.235.242.50 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:91.235.242.242
Name Servers:
ns2.zse.hr
ns3-drs.zse.hr
ns4-drs.zse.hr
MX Records:
0: ljse-si.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073160, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:266ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:194.152.205.83 ip4:194.152.205.84 ip4:194.152.205.13 ip4:213.164.9.10 ip4:193.0.244.250 ip4:193.0.244.19 ip4:193.109.227.66 ip4:91.235.242.52 ip4:91.235.242.50 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including Vue.js for interactive charts and Moment.js for date handling. Cookiebot is integrated for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management, and Google Analytics is loaded asynchronously with consent control. The site is mobile responsive and includes multiple favicon sizes for device compatibility. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of reCAPTCHA and asynchronous analytics scripts. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The technical infrastructure supports a professional financial services website but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Analyze Another Website