Skip to main content

Is llama.fi a Scam? Security Check Results - DefiLlama Reviews

llama.fi favicon

Is llama.fi Safe? Security Analysis for DefiLlama

Check if llama.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactJavaScriptCSSStripe
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:39:29 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website pro.llama.fi offers a tiered API service focused on decentralized finance (DeFi) data, including TVL, revenue, fees, and prices. It targets developers, contributors to DefiLlama's GitHub repositories, and businesses requiring premium DeFi data access. The business model includes a free open API, a paid Pro API subscription, and free access for qualified contributors. The site integrates GitHub OAuth for contributor authentication and Stripe for payment processing, indicating a modern and secure payment infrastructure. The website content is professional and well-structured, with clear pricing and service descriptions.

Detected Technologies

ReactJavaScriptCSSStripe

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

DefiLlama positions itself as a niche provider in the DeFi analytics space, leveraging community contributions and offering premium API services. The integration with GitHub for contributor access fosters community engagement and trust. The use of Stripe for payments and clear documentation links supports a transparent and scalable business model. The absence of physical addresses or phone numbers suggests a primarily digital-first operation. The company appears small but focused, with consistent branding and a clear target audience of developers and DeFi businesses.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@llama.fi

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Stripe for secure payment processing, which are strong security indicators. However, it lacks visible security headers and published security or incident response policies, which are important for transparency and compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and terms of service are gaps in privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adding security headers, formal policies, and cookie consent.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

DefiLlama

Description:

Provides API access to DeFi data including TVL, revenue/fees, prices, and advanced data for contributors and pro users.

Key Services:
Open API access to DeFi dataPro API with premium endpoints and higher limitsContributor API access for GitHub contributors
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactJavaScriptCSSStripe
Frameworks:
React Router
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Stripe for secure payments
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website offers tiered API access with free, pro, and contributor plans

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

33/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net ~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 49 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:pro.llama.fi
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/25/2025 (49 days)
SANs:pro.llama.fi

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:172.66.169.196, 104.20.34.56
AAAA Records:2606:4700:10::6814:2238, 2606:4700:10::ac42:a9c4
Name Servers:
arushi.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
zeus.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
22: route2.mx.cloudflare.net
64: route3.mx.cloudflare.net
66: route1.mx.cloudflare.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with module preloading and React Router for navigation. The tech stack includes JavaScript, CSS, and Stripe for payments. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No CMS or hosting provider information was found. The site does not use advertising or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious design. Technical risks are low, but improvements in accessibility and SEO could enhance user experience and discoverability.
Analyze Another Website