Is lmd.lv Safe? Security Analysis for AS Latvijas Meža Daba
Check if lmd.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
AS Latvijas Meža Daba (LMD) is a Latvian company specializing in professional forest management, timber supply, real estate acquisition, and ecological wooden building delivery. The company offers services including forest stand purchases, carbon credit attraction, forest management, supervision, and consulting. With over 16 years of team experience and a significant presence in the Latvian forestry sector, LMD positions itself as a reliable partner for forest owners and related businesses. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with Elementor, featuring modern web technologies and SEO optimizations. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms, though some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is indicated by a dedicated privacy policy page, but cookie consent mechanisms are not evident. Overall, the site demonstrates good professionalism and trustworthiness, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
LMD operates in the forestry and real estate sectors, targeting forest owners, agricultural landowners, and companies involved in timber processing and ecological construction. The business model combines asset acquisition (forest stands and land), service provision (management, consulting), and product delivery (timber and ECO2 wooden buildings). The company has a medium-sized footprint with a reported turnover of approximately 32 million euros in 2023 and a daily operational presence in multiple forest holdings. Social media engagement and structured data enhance brand visibility. The absence of WHOIS data restricts full legitimacy assessment, but the website content and contact details support a credible business operation.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (4)
Physical Addresses (1)
Company Registration
AS Latvijas Meža Daba
40103678556
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam and abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses up-to-date WordPress and Elementor versions, but continuous monitoring and patching are recommended. Privacy policy presence and GDPR compliance indicators are positive, though cookie consent mechanisms are lacking. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, suggesting room for improvement in security transparency.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
AS Latvijas Meža Daba
Meža apsaimniekošanas ietvaros ASLMD iegādājas cirsmas (augošu koku izstrādes tiesības), un kā pakalpojumus piedāvā – oglekļa (CO2) kredītu piesaisti, meža saimniecības apsaimniekošanu, uzraudzību, nepieciešamo darbu veikšanu un konsultāciju sniegšanu. Piedāvā arī apaļkoksnes piegādi, īpašuma iegādi un ECO2 koku būvju piegādi.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of nonce tokens in AJAX calls
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Facebook, YouTube
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 45 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM9 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings