Skip to main content

Is lmda.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - LMDA Reviews

L

Is lmda.lv Safe? Security Analysis for LMDA

Check if lmda.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
HTMLCSSJavaScript
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:03:15 PM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

LMDA is a Latvian dance association website focused on organizing and managing dance competitions, licensing dance studios, trainers, judges, and supervisors, and publishing competition results and rules. The site targets dance competitors, studios, and officials primarily in Latvia. The business model appears to be non-commercial or association-based, serving a niche community with downloadable results and licensing information. Technically, the website is basic, using static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS. It lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected, and no privacy or cookie policies present. Contact information and social media presence are absent, limiting business credibility and user engagement. Overall, the site is functional but dated and requires modernization and security improvements.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website serves a niche market of dance professionals and enthusiasts in Latvia, providing essential services such as competition calendars, results, and licensing. It maintains partnerships with several dance studios and related organizations, as evidenced by multiple external links. The business operates likely as a small association founded in 2007, with limited digital maturity and no evident revenue streams or e-commerce capabilities. The lack of contact details and privacy policies suggests limited focus on broader commercial or regulatory compliance. Growth potential may depend on digital modernization and enhanced user engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal with no HTTPS detected in the provided data, absence of security headers, and no visible forms or input validation mechanisms. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, GDPR compliance, or incident response contacts. These gaps expose the site to risks such as data interception, lack of user trust, and regulatory non-compliance. The absence of analytics or tracking reduces privacy concerns but also limits security monitoring capabilities. Overall, the site requires urgent implementation of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures to improve security maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LMDA

Description:

LMDA appears to be an organization related to dance competitions, licenses, rules, and results primarily in Latvia. It provides information on competitions, licensing for studios, trainers, judges, and supervisors, as well as rules and contact information. The site offers downloadable results and rating spreadsheets for dance competitions and related events.

Key Services:
Dance competition calendar and resultsLicensing for dance studios, trainers, judges, supervisorsPublishing rules and regulationsProviding downloadable competition results and ratings
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a niche Latvian dance association portal.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

8 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:85.15.231.203
Name Servers:
ns.mm88.lvDNS only
ns2.mm88.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: pasts4.atbalsts.it
SOA:Serial: 2025050914, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:322ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without use of modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, which limits usability on modern devices. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern web standards. The site appears hosted on an unknown provider with no visible CDN or security infrastructure. Technical debt is evident due to dated design and lack of security best practices. Modernization opportunities include adopting responsive design, CMS integration, and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website