Skip to main content

Is loc.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - Library of Congress Reviews

L

Is loc.gov Safe? Security Analysis for Library of Congress

Check if loc.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Statesenterprise
CloudflareJavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:42:09 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website loc.gov represents the Library of Congress, a major US government institution providing archival and research library services. The domain is well-established with a creation date in 1997, consistent with the institution's long history. However, the current HTML content is a Cloudflare security challenge page, blocking access to the actual website content. This prevents detailed analysis of the site's content, policies, and technical implementation. The site uses Cloudflare for security and performance, but no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visible in the provided content. No contact information or social media links are present. The domain registration is privacy protected but justified given the government nature. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content detected, but the security challenge limits the ability to assess the website fully.

Detected Technologies

CloudflareJavaScriptHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Library of Congress operates as a government-funded public service entity, targeting researchers, government officials, and the general public. Its market position is that of a national government institution providing essential archival and legislative research services. The business model is non-commercial, supported by government funding. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries in the provided data. The website likely serves as a digital portal for access to collections and information but is currently inaccessible due to security measures.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs Cloudflare's security services, including a Turnstile captcha challenge to mitigate automated access and potential attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement for DNS security. No security headers or incident response policies are visible in the provided content. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps. The domain registration is privacy protected but legitimate. Overall, the security posture is moderate but limited by the inability to inspect the full site content.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Cloudflare Detected

The HTML content is a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha verifying the user is human before accessing the site.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Company:

Library of Congress

Description:

The Library of Congress is the research library that officially serves the United States Congress and is the de facto national library of the United States.

Key Services:
Archival and research library servicesDigital collections accessLegislative research support

Technical Stack

Technologies:
CloudflareJavaScriptHTML5CSS3

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Key Observations

1

Website content is currently blocked by Cloudflare WAF challenge page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf1.loc.gov include:spf2.loc.gov include:spf-00026101.gpphosted.com mx -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:locdmarc_reports@loc.gov
Forensic Reports:locdmarc_ruf@loc.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:loc.gov
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:12/3/2025 (89 days)
SANs:loc.gov, *.loc.gov, *.le.loc.gov

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(304 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.64.82, 104.17.6.58
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6811:63a, 2606:4700::6812:4052
Name Servers:
alice.ns.cloudflare.com
kevin.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: mx22.loc.gov
5: mx23.loc.gov
5: mx41.loc.gov
5: mx42.loc.gov
SOA:Serial: 2382495568, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:41ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf1.loc.gov include:spf2.loc.gov include:spf-00026101.gpphosted.com mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Cloudflare as a hosting and security provider, leveraging their Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation. The HTML is modern with responsive design considerations, but actual content is blocked by the WAF challenge. No CMS or backend technologies are identifiable from the provided content. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to content blocking. The site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. There is an opportunity to improve DNS security by enabling DNSSEC and to enhance security headers.
Analyze Another Website