Skip to main content

Is locationiq.com a Scam? Security Check Results - LocationIQ Reviews

locationiq.com favicon

Is locationiq.com Safe? Security Analysis for LocationIQ

https://locationiq.com

Check if locationiq.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerPostHogjQueryWebflow+1 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 6:43:38 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

LocationIQ is a technology company providing affordable and scalable location services APIs including geocoding, reverse geocoding, maps, and routing. Positioned as a cost-effective alternative to Google Maps, it serves over 100,000 developers globally with enterprise-grade APIs and a generous free tier. The website reflects a mature business with consistent branding and a clear focus on developer audiences. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, Google Analytics, PostHog for analytics, and Weglot for multilingual support. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare and Amazon Registrar, ensuring robust infrastructure and fast performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anonymized IP tracking, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, though no cookie consent mechanism is evident despite use of tracking scripts. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for SEO and mobile use.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerPostHogjQueryWebflowWeglot

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

LocationIQ holds a strong market position as a reliable and affordable alternative to major location service providers like Google Maps. Its business model centers on API services with tiered pricing, appealing primarily to developers and businesses requiring geolocation capabilities. The company has a long domain history dating back to 2005, supporting its credibility and market presence. Trust signals include uptime guarantees, client testimonials, and data center locations in the US and EU. The company maintains active social media presence on Twitter, LinkedIn, and GitHub, enhancing community engagement. While no explicit parent or subsidiary companies are identified, the company operates independently with a medium-sized footprint in the technology sector.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections preventing unauthorized domain changes. Use of anonymized IPs in analytics shows privacy-conscious practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder transparency and responsiveness in case of security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing clear security governance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LocationIQ

Description:

Affordable Google Maps alternative offering Reverse Geocoding, Geocoding, Maps and Routing APIs with a generous free tier and enterprise-grade APIs.

Key Services:
GeocodingReverse GeocodingMapsRouting
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerPostHogjQueryWebflowWeglot
Frameworks:
Webflow CMS
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics
  • Use of secure cookies with SameSite=None and Secure flags

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsPostHog
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PostHog
Marketing Tools:
Weglot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spf.mtasv.net include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:email.freshdesk.com include:spf.sendinblue.com include:sender.zohosubscriptions.com include:sender.zohosubscriptions.in ~all
DNS Lookups:9/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+eo1kxgzuobr@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:locationiq.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:12/22/2025 (79 days)
SANs:locationiq.com, map-editor.locationiq.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(351 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.25.41.40, 172.67.99.217, 104.25.42.40
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::6819:2a28, 2606:4700:20::ac43:63d9, 2606:4700:20::6819:2928
Name Servers:
ian.ns.cloudflare.com
lily.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spf.mtasv.net include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:email.freshdesk.com include:spf.sendinblue.com include:sender.zohosubscriptions.com include:sender.zohosubscriptions.in ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools like Google Analytics and PostHog. It uses Weglot for multilingual support, enhancing global reach. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare and Amazon Registrar, providing reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is fast with efficient use of CDN resources. Some technical debt is noted in the lack of security headers and cookie consent, which are recommended for modernization. Overall, the technical implementation supports a robust and scalable platform suitable for a developer-focused SaaS business.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about locationiq.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website